Good Move Jolt him!
Bad Move He Caused No Harm!
So instead, we have a device which can cause death vs. a low speed tackle or take down with much less change of overall injury and pain. For trespassing with no threat to others; I'm going to say that tazering is a bit over the line
But hey, thanks for throwing in that nice little hyperbole. Does wonders for your intellectual honesty.
You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
Pfft. This "kid" is facing charges. 'nuff said.
Whats different about it? Do you know?Mmm, yes. Very controlled circumstances vs. field environment. Yup...that's valid.
Or art thou talking out of thy ass again.
Big Fat Guy landing on you. Not exactly all that unlikely. Besides, big fat guy could get injured in the process. But "thats his job to get hurt" right? Thats a douchebag way to think.If he got tackled and if his arm got broken, that's part and parcel to the whole trespass thing. But for the speeds and forces we're talking about; that's highly unlikely.
Its the truth... sadly. Just look at your signature.But hey, thanks for throwing in that nice little hyperbole. Does wonders for your intellectual honesty.
Blah blah blah blah. More talking out of your rear. You don't know anything about being tazed except that a few freak accidents happened and your in knee jerk reaction mode.There is zero need to risk fatal or serious injury from overloading one's own electrical system when a simple tackle/take down would suffice. The human body was designed to take some bumps and bruising. We're not made for electrical short circuit.
Go get tazed, then come talking. You don't know the first thing about it.Would you rather take a tackle or french kiss a light socket? I've played plenty of tackle football, I've been electrocuted too (part and parcel with the whole physics things). I'll take the tackle any day of the week.