• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gay Marriage, is it right to stop it?

Gay Marriage, is it right to stop it?

  • No

    Votes: 99 79.2%
  • Yes, explain

    Votes: 26 20.8%

  • Total voters
    125
Status
Not open for further replies.
Figures you would have nothing to input that was relevant. :2wave:

Much like your "strike one...strike two" crap and the other deflect tactics you tried to employ. Word of advice, those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
 
Much like your "strike one...strike two" crap and the other deflect tactics you tried to employ. Word of advice, those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Completely different. New subject.

You wanted to go round and round about the same thing.

How petty of you. ;)
 
Let people call themselves what they want, just don't force me to call it that.

So there's a law forcing you to call gay marriage "marriage?" And if you don't, you'll be, what, locked up?
 
So there's a law forcing you to call gay marriage "marriage?" And if you don't, you'll be, what, locked up?

"marriage liscense"

Blackdog, I really don't see the point of your argument. How is gay marriage immoral? Who defined marriage as one man and one woman? Many cultures accept one person marrying with someone of the same gender, and one person marrying several people of different genders. Marriage is a bond between two or even more people formed out of love and commitment to each other. That stuff goes way deeper than what parts they have down there
 
1.)How is it not redefining it?



2.)And yet in 2010, it's still not legal in most states and with the Federal government.

I am good.



3.)It certainly is.

1.) because of the fact gays were getting married before either of us was born

2.) yep currently but it will change in our life time how many states allow it now? 6? i honestly dont know.

3.) agreed and its one reason is because we slowly but surely get rid of discrimination which if it was your choice alone we wouldn't, thank god for america!
 
What knee jerk? Everyone has bigotry of some type. It is human nature. I think he is reflecting his onto me.

Nothing knee jerk about that.

fact that you 100% totally misread what he said and totally assumed wrong and went nutzoid, I think i could hear you punching you keyboard LMAO

it was very kneejerk I could but that example by the word for a definition.
 
"marriage liscense"

Blackdog, I really don't see the point of your argument. How is gay marriage immoral? Who defined marriage as one man and one woman? Many cultures accept one person marrying with someone of the same gender, and one person marrying several people of different genders. Marriage is a bond between two or even more people formed out of love and commitment to each other. That stuff goes way deeper than what parts they have down there

I think where you will fail in your argument is that you are using logic, he doesnt like that ;)
 
1.) because of the fact gays were getting married before either of us was born

Not in the US.

2.) yep currently but it will change in our life time how many states allow it now? 6? i honestly dont know.

I highly doubt it. Maybe in my daughters life time. I have maybe 20 or 30 years at most.

Of course I mite be killed in the revolution, lol.

3.) agreed and its one reason is because we slowly but surely get rid of discrimination which if it was your choice alone we wouldn't, thank god for america!

Yes we are allowed to follow our own minds without fear of repercussion etc. This is what makes America great.
 
fact that you 100% totally misread what he said and totally assumed wrong and went nutzoid, I think i could hear you punching you keyboard LMAO

it was very kneejerk I could but that example by the word for a definition.

You think what I typed is going "nutzoid" a paper about Christians helping with suffrage and slavery is going "nutzoid?"

Who knew?
 
"marriage liscense"

Blackdog, I really don't see the point of your argument. How is gay marriage immoral? Who defined marriage as one man and one woman? Many cultures accept one person marrying with someone of the same gender, and one person marrying several people of different genders. Marriage is a bond between two or even more people formed out of love and commitment to each other. That stuff goes way deeper than what parts they have down there

I don't know how many cultures excepted it. I know Western Civilization got it's morals and religion from the Bible at some point. The Bible says it is wrong, in no uncertain terms in both books.
 
I think where you will fail in your argument is that you are using logic, he doesnt like that ;)

Now you are just acting like an ass. All my arguments are logical, you just don't agree with the logic because part of it is based in religion.

Very simple.
 
I don't know how many cultures excepted it. I know Western Civilization got it's morals and religion from the Bible at some point. The Bible says it is wrong, in no uncertain terms in both books.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

1st Amendment. If you want to play this game Western Civilization also got much of its morals from Classical Greece, a society very tolerant of homosexuality.
 
I am not sure if I have ever heard an opinion from a person opposing gay marriage that was not completely illogical. 90+% of the time the opinion is uttered by a total bigot.
 
1.)Not in the US.



2.)I highly doubt it. Maybe in my daughters life time. I have maybe 20 or 30 years at most.

Of course I mite be killed in the revolution, lol.



Yes we are allowed to follow our own minds without fear of repercussion etc. This is what makes America great.

1.) so only america defines marriage now LMAO wow you're getting pathetic with your answers sometimes. So when you quoted the dictionary earlier and it shows the origin of words and sometimes has there "foreign" meanings can I say those dont count LMAO more egg on your face, you are getting easier

2.) now this is just opinion but i think it will for sure, we come so far in my life time and the last 100 years with stomping out unfair and discriminative things like these i dont think it will last much longer. id say 20 years tops but wouldnt be shocked if it happened in half that time.

what revolution?

3.) yes but you arent JUST following your mind, you're trying to force it on others, we are better than that and always seem to fix it no matter how long, thats why we are great
 
Last edited:
Now you are just acting like an ass. All my arguments are logical, you just don't agree with the logic because part of it is based in religion.

Very simple.

only in your mind
im sure Willie coyote thought it was logical to strap a rocket on his back to catch the road runner, just cause he thought it dont make it true :D

I dont agree with it because its very discriminative and the argument could be made its very bigot like
 
Last edited:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

So the government can't pass a law making a state religion or effect the operation of a religion. What does that have to do with anything?

1st Amendment. If you want to play this game Western Civilization also got much of its morals from Classical Greece, a society very tolerant of homosexuality.

I don't know what "game" you are talking about and playing some "game" has nothing to do with my feelings on the issue or religion.

And yet gays did not marry in anchient greece.

"There are more examples of gay couples recorded in Ancient Greece and nowhere in these records a word about public uproar. Yet, in all fairness, never the word marriage either." - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20464004/
 
Last edited:
1st Amendment. If you want to play this game Western Civilization also got much of its morals from Classical Greece, a society very tolerant of homosexuality.

Lol, they were a little more than tolerant . . .
 
only in your mind
im sure Willie coyote thought it was logical to strap a rocket on his back to catch the road runner, just cause he thought it dont make it true :D

Again you really are not wanting to see my argument.

I dont agree with it because its very discriminative and the argument could be made its very bigot like

I think my argument is bigoted and biased. This makes me no less an American or anything else. Your argument is also bigoted, as is it for almost anyone. Everyone takes a side in an issue for whatever reason.

Bigotry is human nature. I am honest enough to admit this.
 
JUST an FYI
not going to say who and its no more than a "guess" but im preety sure i know who hacked the poll since it was largely in favor (80%) of no lol
 
1.) so only america defines marriage now LMAO wow you're getting pathetic with your answers sometimes. So when you quoted the dictionary earlier and it shows the origin of words and sometimes has there "foreign" meanings can I say those dont count LMAO more egg on your face, you are getting easier

Irrelevant to the last 200 years of history in this country.

2.) now this is just opinion but i think it will for sure, we come so far in my life time and the last 100 years with stomping out unfair and discriminative things like these i dont think it will last much longer. id say 20 years tops but wouldnt be shocked if it happened in half that time.

You could be right.

what revolution?

A small jab at Ikari.

He basically said I mite catch a bullet or be killed in the revolution for my views.

3.) yes but you arent JUST following your mind, you're trying to force it on others, we are better than that and always seem to fix it no matter how long, thats why we are great

I live within this society. So I have every right to help make the laws. If others don't like it they are free to change it.

It is the way our system works.
 
Blackdog;10587301371.) said:
Again you really are not wanting to see my argument.



2.)I think my argument is bigoted and biased. This makes me no less an American or anything else. Your argument is also bigoted, as is it for almost anyone. Everyone takes a side in an issue for whatever reason.

Bigotry is human nature. I am honest enough to admit this.

1 no I CLEARLY see it and as I said in my vey first post I agree with your argument and your right to have it 1000000000% but once you use it to discriminate all bets are off and im no longer with you because thats not logical for the debate at hand.

2 how is my argument bigoted and how did i take a side? LMAO
my way EVERYONE gets to do what they want, your way people can only do what YOU want hahahahahahah

yes that makes me feel totally unfair and biased and like a bigot I mean how could i possible feel good about giving people equal rights and freedom and allowing two consenting adults to marry who ever they want and not force my own selfish views on them LOL
 
JUST an FYI
not going to say who and its no more than a "guess" but im preety sure i know who hacked the poll since it was largely in favor (80%) of no lol

I hope you are not trying to imply I did? I voted one time.

I may be an ass, but I don't lie and I am honest all around.
 
1 no I CLEARLY see it and as I said in my vey first post I agree with your argument and your right to have it 1000000000% but once you use it to discriminate all bets are off and im no longer with you because thats not logical for the debate at hand.

I am not discriminating. Anyone can marry anyone else within the law. You can't marry a relative, you can't marry more than one. I see this as no different.

2 how is my argument bigoted and how did i take a side? LMAO

You are correct, I am sorry. You were not pro gay marriage before you were pro gay marriage. :roll:

my way EVERYONE gets to do what they want, your way people can only do what YOU want hahahahahahah

And everyone should not be able to do what they want. We would have no laws if we could.

yes that makes me feel totally unfair and biased and like a bigot I mean how could i possible feel good about giving people equal rights and freedom and allowing two consenting adults to marry who ever they want and not force my own selfish views on them LOL

This is not about equal rights. Never has been. It is about legitimizing an immoral life style.
 
1.)Irrelevant to the last 200 years of history in this country.



2.)You could be right.



3.)A small jab at Ikari.

He basically said I mite catch a bullet or be killed in the revolution for my views.



I live within this society. So I have every right to help make the laws. If others don't like it they are free to change it.

It is the way our system works.

1.) your right you point is totally irrelevant and so was your fallacy about the definition of marriage :)

2.) yep "could" be and what a proud day that will be, more discrimination wiped out

3.) owe, i missed him say that, what revolution was he talking about? lol

4.) again pleas try to stay on topic, straying wont help you cause ill just expose it. I will never tell you you simply dont have the right to vote, of course you do and no matter how bigoted or discriminative your vote is, its your right. Im asking a personally question on what makes you think you have the right to tell two consenting adults who they can marry in america, that sir is none of you business and if you think it is, fine, just admit you are an oppressor and being discriminative. ;)
 
So the government can't pass a law making a state religion or effect the operation of a religion. What does that have to do with anything?

It is favorable to religious sects that are against gay marriage. It is turning their beliefs into law.

I don't know what "game" you are talking about and playing some "game" has nothing to do with my feelings on the issue or religion.

And yet gays did not marry in anchient greece.

"There are more examples of gay couples recorded in Ancient Greece and nowhere in these records a word about public uproar. Yet, in all fairness, never the word marriage either." - Gay marriage goes way back - LiveScience- msnbc.com

Ancient Greece had Gay couples form strong life long bonds that were marriage in everything but name. Even then, this isn't that important to begin with. You still haven't addressed why it's the your's or the government's business to interfere where no one is getting harmed. I don't care if you find it immoral Blackdog. It's none of your concern.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom