So? Of course marriage exists. Lots of things exists that shouldn't. Murder exists, theft exists. I have provided a reasoned argument to stop marriages, including gay marriages, which was the challenge issued in the OP. You have yet to address this argument at all, because you can't. Instead you try and pretend like the argument doesn't address your question.my op is based on marriage exsiting which IT DOES,
Yes, there is a good reason not to allow gay marriage. The good reason is that gay marriage is a type of marriage, which is an institution that needs to be stopped.and since it does my argument is theres no good reason to not allow gay marriage because among other reasons it discrimination.
Ok, supposed you asked for one good reason why blondes shouldn't be allowed to murder brunettes, and your argument was that it was discrimination against blondes. I would say that blondes shouldn't be allowed to murder brunettes because murder infringes on the rights of others. Then you say: "my op is based on murder exsiting which IT DOES, and since it does my argument is theres no good reason to not allow blondes to commit murder because among other reasons it discrimination."Marriage exists sorry, your example is NOT the same by any stretch of the imagination. You just want to keep TRYING to change the debate but i wont let you
Do you see how little sense this makes? Murder needing to be stopped is a perfectly good reason to stop blondes from committing murder against brunettes. Similarly, marriage needing to be stopped is a perfectly good reason to stop gays from getting married.
Says the the one who can't structure a sentence.please continue though has this gets more entertaining with each post and you look more silly
First of all, yes I have. You asked for one good reason not to allow gay marriage, and I have provided one. Since you have failed to form a rebuttal addressing the actual argument, my reasoning has gone unchallenged.your factual error is that you have not argued against the OP
Secondly, even if I hadn't, that wouldn't be a factual error. A factual error is when one presents inaccurate information as fact. If I said that Madrid is the capital of Italy for example, that would be a factual error. Not addressing the OP is not a presentation of information of any kind, and accordingly cannot be a factual error.
The challenge was to provide a good reason for it to be stopped, not to prove that it wasn't discrimination.or proved it isnt discrimination
Irrelevant. You asked for a reason to stop gay marriage. I provided one. You have not formed a rebuttal. You need to either prove that marriage does not give special privileges to married couples that are not available to unmarried individuals, or prove that everyone in the world is married.but then again you cant because that fact will always reign true because it is discrimination
What is funny is you continuing to try and evade addressing your own criteria.keep trying though this is funny
How much denial could you possible have? You seem to REALLY believe it LMAO
Sorry the fact that marriage excisits to only certian groupd and gays are discriminated against the OP still clearly stands has ever reason so far has been found to be:
Let me know when you have something on topic ill be waiting
in my opinion and i stated it earlier, some people simply just dont care if there isnt a good reason. They just simply dont want it "BECAUSE I SAID SO" lol They simply dont mind being unsound. unreasonable, discriminative, illogical, bias, selfish, arrogant, hypercritical, anti-american and or a bigot.
The vast majority of the resons given were the same about not wanting womens rights, minority rights and interracial marriage. They were stupind, meaningless and shallow then and they most certainly continue to be now.
"Never fear. Him is here" - Captain Chaos (Dom DeLuise), Cannonball Run
Mace Windu: Then our worst fears have been realized. We must move quickly if the Jedi Order is to survive.