Over the last couple pages of this "debate" thread I have been discussing with a few you why I oppose homosexual marriage. The initial reaction to my posts was to cite "scientific and academic" studies that prove homosexuality is not a choice and therefore denying them the same rights as heterosexuals is immoral, illegal, or whatever negative word you'd like to use to describe it. When I challenged the assumptions made on hearsay related to "scientific studies" I was called ignorant, uninformed and was told I have an agenda. I say hearsay, because it's obvious that the posters read little more than the title of these studies.
There is no scientific data that legitimizes homosexual behavior. So, using scientific data to both push your agenda and to discredit dissenters is moot. Simply put, many want homosexuality to be legalized for reasons no more valid than those of the many that want it to remain where it is. What it boils down to is two sides disagreeing on an issue and both sides concocting proof to feel confident about their respective stances.
I am no more "uninformed" about the issue for opposing it, than you all are for twisting these studies to fit your position.