- Joined
- Jul 31, 2005
- Messages
- 36,705
- Reaction score
- 17,867
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
You completely missed my point. My post was intended to show you how labeling a group doesn't make you right. I wasn't expressing my own personal beliefs
I was simply using an example from a hypothetical misguided anti-gun side's perspective, as your post was an example of a misguided conservative side's perspective..
You point did not work because I as most pro-2nd amendment advocates know that unconstitutional laws against the 2nd amendment do not work and therefore do not see a point in them.
And my point is proven because pro-gun owners would not love to see gang members, drug dealers and unstable people to own guns... at least I assume they wouldn't love to see that, as the types I listed should be the last people to own guns... being they are criminals or criminal types.
You point is not proven. Most pro-2nd amendment advocates know that anti-2nd amendment laws do not stop criminals as they are allegedly intended for,they stop law abiding citizens.
Then you are anti-2nd amendment unless of course you are trying to argue that you can advocate hate speech laws and government controlling what you can and can't say and what religion you can be a part of and still be pro-1st amendment. Surely if you support a blatant infringement of one right then the 4th and other other rights are open up to infringements as well.My point is also proven by this poll, where no one has voted "yes", even though you assume anti-gun people would vote "yes". Well, I'm not anti-gun, but anti-civilians-owning-automatic-weapons... and I voted "no".