• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Oral Sex 'Sex'?

Is Oral Sex 'Sex'?

  • Of course it is

    Votes: 42 64.6%

  • Only if it culminates in orgasm

    Votes: 3 4.6%

  • It is not sex

    Votes: 12 18.5%

  • Undecided

    Votes: 4 6.2%

  • other

    Votes: 4 6.2%
  • Total voters
    65
Dav said:
Please don't ruin this thread with partisanship.

We were having a perfectly decent conversation about having sex with holes in people's sides.
Click to expand...

Would it be sex if it were oral sex?:doh
 
In my mind its a sexual act, not sexual intercourse. The problem is the shortened version "Sex" gets used for both of those things often so its hard to get intent behind them.
 
I don't consider it sex. Sexual? Without a doubt. But SEX? Not so much.

But, some of the definitions of sexual intercourse mean that my gyno and I have had sex. :roll:
 
1069 said:
Ewww. Oral stoma sex. Stomalingus? :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

Yeah, more of that. I want more nightmares like I had last night. Awesome.
 
CriticalThought said:
Silly heathens. It's simple teleology. You cannot make a baby by putting the penis or vagina to the mouth. The mouth is not a reproductive organ, therefore it is a sin against nature to use it as such. Any deviation from the grand design is not normal and is thus abhorrent and sinful.

You can't spell immoral without oral. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...
that's completely ridiculous. if god didn't want us to have oral sex, she wouldn't have made it feel so great.
 
MyOwnDrum said:
You make a reasonable point, actually...
Click to expand...
no, he does not. a woman should be ashamed if she can't bear children? seriously? then GOD should be freaking ashamed that he made her defective, right?

if a man shoots blanks, should he be ashamed?
 
This attitude toward oral sex represents a dramatic and sudden shift in thinking since 1991, when a similar survey found that nearly twice as many young adults (about 40%) would classify oral-genital contact as sex.
Click to expand...

Really? There's certainly a difference between third base and home plate, and a triple's been inferior to a home run as long as I can remember.
 
liblady said:
no, he does not. a woman should be ashamed if she can't bear children? seriously? then GOD should be freaking ashamed that he made her defective, right?

if a man shoots blanks, should he be ashamed?
Click to expand...

That's a very offensive insinuation indeed.
Who said this?
I couldn't find the original quote.
 
1069 said:
That's a very offensive insinuation indeed.
Who said this?
I couldn't find the original quote.
Click to expand...



It was tongue in cheek.....(unless there's something else on this thread I missed)


CriticalThought said:
Anything that would dissociate the sex act from the procreative act is also morally reprehensible. First you have a man masturbating to deliver a sample, which is very undignified and sinful since the hand is not a reproductive organ. Then you have the sample being injected into the woman by a doctor or the woman herself, which is very undignified and sinful since that is what the father's penis was designed to do.

If a woman cannot get pregnant without the help of artificial insemination, then clearly she has failed her job as a woman. Woman were designed to have babies and if they can't accomplish that task through normal means, then they are failures and should be ashamed.

This is all simple teleology taken to its logical conclusion.
Click to expand...
 
CriticalThought said:
Silly heathens. It's simple teleology. You cannot make a baby by putting the penis or vagina to the mouth. The mouth is not a reproductive organ, therefore it is a sin against nature to use it as such. Any deviation from the grand design is not normal and is thus abhorrent and sinful.

You can't spell immoral without oral. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

Hey, that means every time I get some oral I'm allowed to spell immoral?

CriticalThought said:
It's your own fault for tempting Adam into eating the fruit. If you silly women would just learn to stop filling men with lust and temptation, then it wouldn't have to be this way.
Click to expand...

I thought it was Eve "eating" Adam's "fruit" that led to all the problems...

Man, I love your posts Mr CriticalThought, one of my comedy heroes died years ago and I'm sure he'd enjoy your oneliners.

[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riloBCqixeE"]YouTube- Up The Chastity Belt Clips[/nomedia]

You're brilliant or unintentional.. :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom