- Joined
- Jun 11, 2009
- Messages
- 19,657
- Reaction score
- 8,454
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
This is a bit over the top. Do you have a biblical cite for this one or are you just that uptight?
Who needs a biblical cite for teleology?
This is a bit over the top. Do you have a biblical cite for this one or are you just that uptight?
Yes, Clinton was guilty of having sex with THAT woman. Now back to the topic, it contains the word "sex" doesn't it? :roll:Head is just a tease. It's like a preview.
Who needs a biblical cite for teleology?
"...hate filled vendetta". :thinking ...rrriiiiight. I think we'll just end the conversation now.:roll:
I noticed your conversation while adding to mine. How conversations can wander....heh.
I'm not sure if you are joking, or not. If you aren't, I totally agree with you. I find it very respectable for a religious type to say something to the degree of "It's all faith". A lot less bull**** in that equation.
Sorry, I thought you were trying to make a moral argument against oral sex on theological grounds, which there are none. There is a big argument, on theological grounds that any sex after divorce is a sin, but that is another discussion. There are numerous Christian websites on sexuality that suggest oral and even anal sex, between married couples, as healthy sexual expression.
On telelogical grounds, I submit your argument is even shallower or at least less defensible. Oral sex can be a form of stimulation like any other stimulation, which can a) lead to purposeful intercourse or b) just an expression of love and bonding that enhances the martial relationship.
The argument that a sex act that does not lead to procreation could extend to kissing or any type of fondling. I don't see how oral sex would be any different, teleologically speaking, of course.
Dude, that was a joke. A rather obvious one too, or so I thought, since it was completely and purposely inaccurate. Chill. This is the internet.
Sorry, I thought you were trying to make a moral argument against oral sex on theological grounds, which there are none.
No problem, mate. Just understand liberal usage of descriptive language can mislead my perception of what you are trying to say. It did seem we both thought the other was attacking. Did it not?
Wearing blue jeans is "sodomy". It's an "unnatural" fashion statement, just like short shorts for men. Blue jeans were designed in the 1800s for ranch hands, not for trendy suburbanites. It is a sin before Zeus. All blue jean fornicators will freeze their asses off in Hades.It's sodomy. It's an "unnatural" sexual act, just like anal sex. The mouth was not designed for procreation. It's a sin before God. All mouth fornicators will burn in hell.
This is what these young adults are referring to when they say it's not "sex":Here's the article:
Most Young Adults: Oral Sex Is Not Sex - CBS News
Apparently, most young adults don't think oral sex is actually 'sex'.
Doesn't matter "what I think", because this is the most general definition of "sex" in the "having sex" sense:What do you think?
Yes they are. I just posted the technical definition for you since you were unaware of it (apparently).What do these findings say about homosexual 'sex'? Are they really having 'sex'?
This is what these young adults are referring to when they say it's not "sex":
Actually, belly-button sex would make you a pretty big whore.
Yes, Clinton was guilty of having sex with THAT woman. Now back to the topic, it contains the word "sex" doesn't it?
I read an article awhile back about an old homeless dude who had a colostomy bag, and he was in jail, and they found that he had some kind of STD... in the hole in his side... where the bag attached to him.
:mrgreen:
He'd been letting guys **** him in that hole in his side.
I read an article awhile back about an old homeless dude who had a colostomy bag, and he was in jail, and they found that he had some kind of STD... in the hole in his side... where the bag attached to him.
:mrgreen:
He'd been letting guys **** him in that hole in his side.
Wow. Glad I had dinner already. Thanks for that wonderful story.
Is Oral Sex 'Sex'? Depends on your politics. Republicans decided to make it sex because they were trying to defame a democrat president. Even though Bill Clinton ask the legal definition of sex before republicans ask their stupid immoral question, and oral sex wasn't included. They called it sex anyway so they could say Clinton lied. Everyone seems to think it was Bill and Monica that had every teen in America giggling and talking about oral sex, but actually it was the republicans in their zest to slander a democrat that did it. Bill and Monica never told anyone.
I was trying to find the article (it was several years ago that I read it).
I can't find it, but I found this.
Hold onto your lunch:
Pt.'s partner asked to have intercourse with a stoma ! - Nursing for Nurses
Read the comments. Apparently, it's quite common.
It simply reinforced one of my long-held beliefs: that when a woman- any woman- whines that she can't find a guy to **** her, she's full of it.
It's like, hon? Try that line of guys over there, screwing that elderly transient in the stoma.
:roll: