• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Oral Sex 'Sex'?

Is Oral Sex 'Sex'?

  • Of course it is

    Votes: 42 64.6%

  • Only if it culminates in orgasm

    Votes: 3 4.6%

  • It is not sex

    Votes: 12 18.5%

  • Undecided

    Votes: 4 6.2%

  • other

    Votes: 4 6.2%
  • Total voters
    65
Hatuey said:
Head is just a tease. It's like a preview.
Click to expand...
Yes, Clinton was guilty of having sex with THAT woman. Now back to the topic, it contains the word "sex" doesn't it? :roll:
 
CriticalThought said:
Who needs a biblical cite for teleology?
Click to expand...

Sorry, I thought you were trying to make a moral argument against oral sex on theological grounds, which there are none. There is a big argument, on theological grounds that any sex after divorce is a sin, but that is another discussion. There are numerous Christian websites on sexuality that suggest oral and even anal sex, between married couples, as healthy sexual expression.

On telelogical grounds, I submit your argument is even shallower or at least less defensible. Oral sex can be a form of stimulation like any other stimulation, which can a) lead to purposeful intercourse or b) just an expression of love and bonding that enhances the martial relationship.

The argument that a sex act that does not lead to procreation could extend to kissing or any type of fondling. I don't see how oral sex would be any different, teleologically speaking, of course.
 
Last edited:
Telecaster said:
"...hate filled vendetta". :thinking ...rrriiiiight. I think we'll just end the conversation now.:roll:
Click to expand...

Dude, that was a joke. A rather obvious one too, or so I thought, since it was completely and purposely inaccurate. Chill. This is the internet.
 
Sanitas said:
I noticed your conversation while adding to mine. How conversations can wander....heh.

I'm not sure if you are joking, or not. If you aren't, I totally agree with you. I find it very respectable for a religious type to say something to the degree of "It's all faith". A lot less bull**** in that equation.
Click to expand...

I think religion is simultaneously the greatest and most horrible of mans creations.

We stopped to listen to a streat preacher yesterday, interesting stuff.
 
upsideguy said:
Sorry, I thought you were trying to make a moral argument against oral sex on theological grounds, which there are none. There is a big argument, on theological grounds that any sex after divorce is a sin, but that is another discussion. There are numerous Christian websites on sexuality that suggest oral and even anal sex, between married couples, as healthy sexual expression.

On telelogical grounds, I submit your argument is even shallower or at least less defensible. Oral sex can be a form of stimulation like any other stimulation, which can a) lead to purposeful intercourse or b) just an expression of love and bonding that enhances the martial relationship.

The argument that a sex act that does not lead to procreation could extend to kissing or any type of fondling. I don't see how oral sex would be any different, teleologically speaking, of course.
Click to expand...

According to the Catholic Church, any form of sex outside of sexual intercourse is not permissible because it cannot lead to procreation.
 
Flea said:
Dude, that was a joke. A rather obvious one too, or so I thought, since it was completely and purposely inaccurate. Chill. This is the internet.
Click to expand...

No problem, mate. Just understand liberal usage of descriptive language can mislead my perception of what you are trying to say. It did seem we both thought the other was attacking. Did it not?
 
upsideguy said:
Sorry, I thought you were trying to make a moral argument against oral sex on theological grounds, which there are none.
Click to expand...

There are plenty of such arguments, and plenty of people who believe them (but not me).
 
Telecaster said:
No problem, mate. Just understand liberal usage of descriptive language can mislead my perception of what you are trying to say. It did seem we both thought the other was attacking. Did it not?
Click to expand...

I didn't think that you were attacking at all. Not even subtly. I don't take things as an attack until there is something direct, otherwise it is all fun and games, IMO.

Are you from down under?
 
CriticalThought said:
It's sodomy. It's an "unnatural" sexual act, just like anal sex. The mouth was not designed for procreation. It's a sin before God. All mouth fornicators will burn in hell.
Click to expand...
Wearing blue jeans is "sodomy". It's an "unnatural" fashion statement, just like short shorts for men. Blue jeans were designed in the 1800s for ranch hands, not for trendy suburbanites. It is a sin before Zeus. All blue jean fornicators will freeze their asses off in Hades.

;)
 
MyOwnDrum said:
Here's the article:
Most Young Adults: Oral Sex Is Not Sex - CBS News

Apparently, most young adults don't think oral sex is actually 'sex'.
Click to expand...
This is what these young adults are referring to when they say it's not "sex":

abstinencechart.jpg


What do you think?
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter "what I think", because this is the most general definition of "sex" in the "having sex" sense:


sexual intercourse
 
–noun
genital contact, esp. the insertion of the penis into the vagina followed by orgasm; coitus; copulation.

Sexual intercourse | Define Sexual intercourse at Dictionary.com

So "sex" does not necessarily refer to just vaginal intercourse.

What do these findings say about homosexual 'sex'? Are they really having 'sex'?
Click to expand...
Yes they are. I just posted the technical definition for you since you were unaware of it (apparently).

/end discussion
 
Last edited:
Catz Part Deux said:
Actually, belly-button sex would make you a pretty big whore.
Click to expand...

I read an article awhile back about an old homeless dude who had a colostomy bag, and he was in jail, and they found that he had some kind of STD... in the hole in his side... where the bag attached to him.

:mrgreen:

He'd been letting guys **** him in that hole in his side.
 
Yes, Clinton was guilty of having sex with THAT woman. Now back to the topic, it contains the word "sex" doesn't it?
Click to expand...

Is Oral Sex 'Sex'? Depends on your politics. Republicans decided to make it sex because they were trying to defame a democrat president. Even though Bill Clinton ask the legal definition of sex before republicans ask their stupid immoral question, and oral sex wasn't included. They called it sex anyway so they could say Clinton lied. Everyone seems to think it was Bill and Monica that had every teen in America giggling and talking about oral sex, but actually it was the republicans in their zest to slander a democrat that did it. Bill and Monica never told anyone.
 
1069 said:
I read an article awhile back about an old homeless dude who had a colostomy bag, and he was in jail, and they found that he had some kind of STD... in the hole in his side... where the bag attached to him.

:mrgreen:

He'd been letting guys **** him in that hole in his side.
Click to expand...

That is so damn wrong and so damn hilarious at the same time. See? Belly button sex = whore.
 
1069 said:
I read an article awhile back about an old homeless dude who had a colostomy bag, and he was in jail, and they found that he had some kind of STD... in the hole in his side... where the bag attached to him.

:mrgreen:

He'd been letting guys **** him in that hole in his side.
Click to expand...

Wow. Glad I had dinner already. Thanks for that wonderful story.
 
So, according to this poll, I'm not a virgin! YYYEEESS!

According to my belief, however, I am.
 
This thread sucks!!:mrgreen::mrgreen:
 
jacksbrat said:
Is Oral Sex 'Sex'? Depends on your politics. Republicans decided to make it sex because they were trying to defame a democrat president. Even though Bill Clinton ask the legal definition of sex before republicans ask their stupid immoral question, and oral sex wasn't included. They called it sex anyway so they could say Clinton lied. Everyone seems to think it was Bill and Monica that had every teen in America giggling and talking about oral sex, but actually it was the republicans in their zest to slander a democrat that did it. Bill and Monica never told anyone.
Click to expand...

Please don't ruin this thread with partisanship.

We were having a perfectly decent conversation about having sex with holes in people's sides.
 
This is the funniest thing I have heard all day. Thanks. :)
 
It simply reinforced one of my long-held beliefs: that when a woman- any woman- whines that she can't find a guy to **** her, she's full of it.
It's like, hon? Try that line of guys over there, screwing that elderly transient in the stoma.

:roll:
 
1069 said:
It simply reinforced one of my long-held beliefs: that when a woman- any woman- whines that she can't find a guy to **** her, she's full of it.
It's like, hon? Try that line of guys over there, screwing that elderly transient in the stoma.

:roll:
Click to expand...

Yeah, but what if they refuse her? Then she'd be the lady who even guys who **** stomas won't touch.
 
This thread is why we need sex ed in schools by the way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom