• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What Should Be Done About Rangel?

What to do with a corrupt Rangel:

  • Pretend nothing happened.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    11

Scarecrow Akhbar

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
11,430
Reaction score
2,282
Location
Los Angeles
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Charlie Rangel ruling puts Nancy Pelosi in a jam

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/33564.html#ixzz0gg0W5IPl
The House ethics committee's decision to admonish New York Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel over improper corporate-sponsored trips to the Caribbean leaves Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the ethics committee itself facing difficult questions.


When then-Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) was admonished by the ethics committee in October 2004, Pelosi and other Democratic leaders went on the offensive against him.


“Mr. DeLay has proven himself to be ethically unfit to lead the party,” Pelosi said at a news conference the following day. “The burden falls upon his fellow House Republicans. Republicans must answer: Do they want an ethically unfit person to be their majority leader or do they want to remove the ethical cloud that hangs over the Capitol?”


Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) — now the House majority leader — said DeLay "certainly ought to step aside as leader at this point in time because I think his credibility has been undermined by these findings."


Six years later, the shoe is on the other foot: Republicans have previously called for Rangel to lose his chairmanship over his ethical troubles, and some of them — including Indiana Rep. Mike Pence — renewed that call Thursday night.


How will Pelosi and Hoyer respond?


Neither had anything to say about Rangel's future Thursday night, but the issue is certain to be a central topic for Democratic leadership in the days ahead.


The ethics committee's decision on Rangel's trips resolves just a small part of the ethical controversy in which he's caught up. The ethics committee is still investigating a variety of issues related to Rangel's personal finances, including his use of a rent-stabilized apartment, his fundraising on behalf of a research institute bearing his name, and his failure to declare hundreds of thousands of dollars on income and assets on annual financial-disclosure reports.


The ethics committee, meanwhile, appears to have issues of its own.


In a statement Thursday night, committee leaders Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) and Jo Bonner (R-Ala.), took Rangel and his staff to task — but also admonished the committee's own former counsel.


"The evidence shows that Rep. Rangel’s staff knew that corporations had contributed funds to Carib News specifically for the 2007 and 2007 [trips],” Lofgren and Bonner said. “This information was not provided to the Standards Committee when [Rangel] sought and received approval to accept these trips.”

What should be done about Rangel if he doesn't have the decency to resign?

I say impeach then prosecute. The standards of behavior for elected officials must be shown to be higher than for mere mortals.
 
Last edited:
How about a fair and even hearing, then a trail, if there really was any wrong-doing.
When these people misuse public monies, they must be forced to pay back at least 100%, I do not care who it is and of course, a man's political party cannot be a factor.
No vote, of course.
 
If the people don't like it then they should vote him out.
 
How about a fair and even hearing, then a trail, if there really was any wrong-doing.
When these people misuse public monies, they must be forced to pay back at least 100%, I do not care who it is and of course, a man's political party cannot be a factor.
No vote, of course.

The Ethics Committee...the Democrat led and dominated Ethics Committee has already determined that wrong doing has happened, and the one thing that is certain is that they downplayed the extent of it.

A man in public office convicted of playing lose with tax payer dollars has to do more than pay the money back. He should have to reach his hands out through the bars of his prison cell to do it.
 
I can't support him being impeached and prosecuted. The man should be removed from his chairmanships though and should basically be told he will not receive DNC support for a re-election, basically cutting his political career down and putting him out to pasture. This is why we need a cap on how many times politicians can get re-elected. He got too comfortable, grew too much ego and got too big of a mouth over too long of a time. My expectation is Pelosi will be a hypocrite ****, which is her nature and stand behind Rangel. IF that happens, I'll change my vote to prosecute.

And let us not forget those poignant words from Pelosi herself:

"The American people voted to restore integrity and honesty in Washington, D.C., and the Democrats intend to lead the most honest, most open and most ethical Congress in history."

Intend? Doubted it then, laugh at it now.
 
Either Ms Pelosi and the rest of the Democrats and the Republicans are serious when they intone their dislike of corruption.
Or,
With the Democrats this only applies to Republican officials caught with their hands in the cookie jar.
With the Republican this only applies to Democrats officials caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

Boot all the bums you can in the Mid term elections.
 
I'm always hesitant about calling for impeachment of public officials, but Rangel is so mind bogglingly corrupt that I'm willing to make an exception. He's almost certainly unwilling to resign like most people in this situation, so he'd have to be impeached. That isn't gonna happen though, so the end result will probably be that he will retire in 6 or 8 years, live off his millions, and have the street next to Adam Clayton Powell Blvd named after him.
 
You start with stripping him of chairmanships, then you prosecute him. Corruption cannot be allowed.
 
You start with stripping him of chairmanships, then you prosecute him. Corruption cannot be allowed.
Trouble is, it currently IS allowed.
 
And people currently don't trust the government much. Wonder if the two are related...
Impossible! :eek:

Your theory CAN'T be correct. :shock:
 
Back
Top Bottom