• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who most deserves to get to punch Rush Limbaugh in the mouth?

Who most deserves to punch Rush Limbaugh in the mouth?

  • Jesse Jackson

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Bill Clinton

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Barak Obama

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • The CEO of ESPN

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • the black woman whom Rush told "take that bone out of your nose"

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • any black person

    Votes: 1 5.9%

  • any Jewish person

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • any decent American

    Votes: 13 76.5%

  • any drug addict

    Votes: 1 5.9%

  • Donovan McNabb

    Votes: 2 11.8%
  • Total voters
    17
samsmart said:
Excuse me, but the biggest crack down of free speech has happened during G.W.B.'s tenure. After Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction," people would call into the FCC about being offended by every little thing on tv and radio. It was so bad that when CBS tried to air "Saving Private Ryan" for Veteran's Day, John McCain had to ask people not to get offended by the course language.

Liberals may want government control of free speech regarding politics, but conservatives want government control of free speech regarding morality.
Click to expand...

BS-people complaining about that wardrobe event were private citizens. are you saying bush caused that

btw I am talking about a crack down on political speech which is clearly the speech contemplated by the founders.

The brady thugs tried to get a court to enjoin the NRA from running ads that promote gun ownership. How many liberal political pundits have had pies thrown at them at university appearances?

As I noted, most liberal agendas are emotionally based and that doesn't work in a debate
 
NoJingoLingo said:
Every time a liberal speaker tries to speak at a conservative college. :roll:
There are few talkers on the left who can compare to the aggressive nature of imbeciles like Ann Coulter.


I'm certainly not for the Fairness Doctrine but, when radio returns to the free market let us know.


face it, republicanism is mainly fear and when you're ignorant, fear trumps reason.
Click to expand...

really?

libs fear gun ownership

libs fear people keeping what they earn

libs claim the poor will starve and children will be thrown out in the street unless taxes are hiked

libs claim jobs will be outsourced unless the government controls business

liberalism as practiced by american lefties is based on fear and loathing. Most rightwing agendas involve letting people succeed without being hampered by the lowest common denominator or the crud of mediocrity
 
Captain America said:
My thoughts exactly. :confused:

So I went back to the first post on this thread to see who threw out the first "insult" and it was in post three. "Why do liberals hate free speech."

Even though it was an insignificant troll post, the point being, it was thrown there by one of the usual suspects.

But, in all fairness, the entire thread was most likely created to lure the posters out from under their rocks. I see no positive things coming from this thread. It was only made to incite discord, so, whatever. Nobody claims the moral highground.
Click to expand...

wrong-there was no insult

and the insult is claiming my post was a troll post

I was being serious-if someone punches limbaugh in the face I hope he does kill them. that is the proper response to an unprovoked felonious attack on someone
 
TurtleDude said:
really?

libs fear gun ownership

libs fear people keeping what they earn

libs claim the poor will starve and children will be thrown out in the street unless taxes are hiked

libs claim jobs will be outsourced unless the government controls business

liberalism as practiced by american lefties is based on fear and loathing. Most rightwing agendas involve letting people succeed without being hampered by the lowest common denominator or the crud of mediocrity
Click to expand...

So democrats are not libs.
Most democrats own guns and believe in God.
Democrats want to keep what they earn.
Democrats want to pay less taxes.
Democrats want to help those that can not help themselves.
Democrats know companies will outsource if it helps the bottom line.
Democrats know that the rightwing agendas have created Enron, Worldcom, Lehman Bros, The banking crisis, Madoff, The savings and loan crisis of the 80s, and the mess we are in now. The right wing agenda lets a few succeed at the expense of the little guy.
 
USA-1 said:
So democrats are not libs.
Most democrats own guns and believe in God.
Democrats want to keep what they earn.
Democrats want to pay less taxes.
Democrats want to help those that can not help themselves.
Democrats know companies will outsource if it helps the bottom line.
Democrats know that the rightwing agendas have created Enron, Worldcom, Lehman Bros, The banking crisis, Madoff, The savings and loan crisis of the 80s, and the mess we are in now. The right wing agenda lets a few succeed at the expense of the little guy.
Click to expand...

proof?

democrats want to own guns yet every federal restriction on gun owners was sponsored by dems

dems want people to pay less taxes? LOL they want to pay less taxes themselves but want to jack them up on others.

dems want to addict people to government handouts so they are beholden to dem masters

anyone who thinks rich dems want the poor to escape poverty is willfully ignorant. If the poor ceased to exist, so would the dem party
 
TurtleDude said:
proof?

democrats want to own guns yet every federal restriction on gun owners was sponsored by dems

dems want people to pay less taxes? LOL they want to pay less taxes themselves but want to jack them up on others.

dems want to addict people to government handouts so they are beholden to dem masters

anyone who thinks rich dems want the poor to escape poverty is willfully ignorant. If the poor ceased to exist, so would the dem party
Click to expand...

I am talking about people not politicians.
Democrats own guns. Just like republicans.
Only an idiot would want to pay more taxes so others could pay less.:roll:
Democrats are the hard workers that just want a fair shake. Most do not want or need handouts.
Democrats want less government especially on social issues. Government has always gotten bigger under republican rule.
Anyone that believes republicans want to help the poor and middle class is the ignorant one. If they did, the democrats would never win an election.

There will always be poor and the republican agenda is for the rich to get richer and the poor to remain poor.
 
USA-1 said:
I am talking about people not politicians.
Democrats own guns. Just like republicans.
Only an idiot would want to pay more taxes so others could pay less.:roll:
Democrats are the hard workers that just want a fair shake. Most do not want or need handouts.
Democrats want less government especially on social issues. Government has always gotten bigger under republican rule.
Anyone that believes republicans want to help the poor and middle class is the ignorant one. If they did, the democrats would never win an election.

There will always be poor and the republican agenda is for the rich to get richer and the poor to remain poor.
Click to expand...

1) if Dem politicians believed dem voters owned guns at the same rate as republicans I doubt dem politicians would push gun bans. Almost every group that pushes for gun bans is allied with the dem party-be it the NAACP or several jewish groups etc

2) the net tax payers in this country are outnumbered by net tax consumers
dems want to hike taxes and that has been overwhelmingly the case for 70 years

3) the dems help the poor like pushers help junkies. believe me, most junkies prefer their pusher over someone who wants them to go cold turkey

4) I have never met a republican who wants to keep people poor. We just realize taxing the rich won't make lazy, untalented or unproductive people hard working, ambitious or talented. Rather, welfare socialism is an opiate of the masses and keeps many people comfortably numb. I have never heard a republican denigrate someone who becomes wealthy through hard work. Plenty of liberals do.

5) the government-federally speaking, really doesn't change on social issues. FDR and his judges was the major cause for growth in government when his judges determined that the commerce clause was a blank check for congressional power
 
TurtleDude said:
1) if Dem politicians believed dem voters owned guns at the same rate as republicans I doubt dem politicians would push gun bans. Almost every group that pushes for gun bans is allied with the dem party-be it the NAACP or several jewish groups etc

2) the net tax payers in this country are outnumbered by net tax consumers
dems want to hike taxes and that has been overwhelmingly the case for 70 years

3) the dems help the poor like pushers help junkies. believe me, most junkies prefer their pusher over someone who wants them to go cold turkey

4) I have never met a republican who wants to keep people poor. We just realize taxing the rich won't make lazy, untalented or unproductive people hard working, ambitious or talented. Rather, welfare socialism is an opiate of the masses and keeps many people comfortably numb. I have never heard a republican denigrate someone who becomes wealthy through hard work. Plenty of liberals do.

5) the government-federally speaking, really doesn't change on social issues. FDR and his judges was the major cause for growth in government when his judges determined that the commerce clause was a blank check for congressional power
Click to expand...
Democrats do not want to ban guns.
Democrats want to raise taxes on higher income brackets. The lawyers, CEOs, Bankers, Wall St types,
Democrats try to help others even though the results don't always pan out.



You are in denial if you think republicans are any better than democrats.
They are protecting their interests and if you think they care about your interests you are in dreamland.
 
USA-1 said:
Democrats do not want to ban guns.
Democrats want to raise taxes on higher income brackets. The lawyers, CEOs, Bankers, Wall St types,
Democrats try to help others even though the results don't always pan out.



You are in denial if you think republicans are any better than democrats.
They are protecting their interests and if you think they care about your interests you are in dreamland.
Click to expand...

more nonsense--Eric Holder stated he wanted the clinton gun ban reinstated. he is a dem. When Obama was a state senator-he wanted a complete ban on handguns-he is a dem. Biden voted for every gun ban that ever hit the senate -He is a dem

Feinstein admitted if she had the votes in 1994, she would have passed a law to confiscate every semi auto owned in america--she is a dem

Major Owens-a former dem congressman from NY tried to repeal the second amendment

The DC council banned all handguns in DC-they were all dems. In chicago, handguns are banned-by DEMS. Governor Florio banned semi auto rifles in NJ with the help of the legislature-DEMS. The 1934 NFA was passed by dems. the 1968 GCG was passed by dems. The Hughes Amendment was passed by dems. the clinton gun ban was passed by dems, Carolyn McCarthy-Dem NY wants an extensive ban on semi autos.

true, there are some GOP gun haters-RINO Mayor of NY, the Chaffees in RI etc but every major gun ban in the USA was dem sponsored and mainly passed by DEMS

dems raise taxes on people who already pay too much of the taxes to buy the votes of the parasite classes
 
TurtleDude said:
dems raise taxes on people who already pay too much of the taxes to buy the votes of the parasite classes
Click to expand...

Which classes are you referring to? Those that the government bailed out? Or the ones that get billions in subsidies?
 
Last edited:
TurtleDude said:
BS-people complaining about that wardrobe event were private citizens. are you saying bush caused that
Click to expand...

No, I'm saying conservatives made too big a deal out of it. They had the FCC look at recordings of that event over and over and over again to see whether or not they should be fined. The FCC shouldn't be in the business of regulating content.

TurtleDude said:
btw I am talking about a crack down on political speech which is clearly the speech contemplated by the founders.
Click to expand...

So you're saying this makes it okay for the government to crack down on non-political speech? Especially that which you don't like?

TurtleDude said:
The brady thugs tried to get a court to enjoin the NRA from running ads that promote gun ownership. How many liberal political pundits have had pies thrown at them at university appearances?
Click to expand...

I don't care.

TurtleDude said:
As I noted, most liberal agendas are emotionally based and that doesn't work in a debate
Click to expand...

Yeah, and conservative moral guardians who are scared of seeing a tit on television have arguments totally based on rationality. Sure sure, whatever you say.
 
TurtleDude said:
I hope he shoots anyone who does

why do liberals have such hatred for free speech?
Click to expand...

I have to point this hypocrisy out. Jamesrage thanked this post, while he made the following thread asking who deserves to "beat the hell out of Jane Fonda and Code Pink." Make sure you look at the poll results. He voted for all of the above.

This is the most hypocritical thing I've ever seen in my life, bar none.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/polls/66225-deserves-most-beat-hell-out-jane-fonda-and-code-pink.html
 
Last edited:
After I made the poll, I thought of the one person who most deserves to be a choice in it: Michael J. Fox. The way Rush Limbaugh treated him was just plain cruel and evil.
 
Luna Tick said:
Who most deserves to get to punch Rush Limbaugh in the mouth?
Click to expand...

I would personally prefer to sit down with him in his Cape Gerardo home, light up one of his fine cigars in a location overlooking the ocean, and spend the evening in conversation. I might even indulge in an adult beverage, as I'm told he keeps a very fine wine cellar.

I might try to intrest him in funding a business venture or donating to my favorite charity, since he is a major philanthropist.

Punch him in the mouth? Hardly.
 
TurtleDude said:
really?

libs fear gun ownership

libs fear people keeping what they earn

libs claim the poor will starve and children will be thrown out in the street unless taxes are hiked

libs claim jobs will be outsourced unless the government controls business

liberalism as practiced by american lefties is based on fear and loathing. Most rightwing agendas involve letting people succeed without being hampered by the lowest common denominator or the crud of mediocrity
Click to expand...
See how easy it is to be fearful when you're ignorant?

libs do not fear gun ownership

libs do not fear people keeping what they earn

libs claim the poor will starve and children will be thrown out in the street unless taxes are hiked

libs claim jobs will be outsourced unless the government controls business
Click to expand...
Provide a source or we'll assume you're just a liar.

liberalism as practiced by american lefties is based on fear and loathing. Most rightwing agendas involve letting people succeed without being hampered by the lowest common denominator or the crud of mediocrity
Click to expand...
:elephantf :lamo :screwy
 
NoJingoLingo said:
See how easy it is to be fearful when you're ignorant?

libs do not fear gun ownership

libs do not fear people keeping what they earn


Provide a source or we'll assume you're just a liar.


:elephantf :lamo :screwy
Click to expand...

really-so why do so many libs want to ban guns

so why do so many libs support death confiscation taxes and high rates of progressive income taxes

provide a source for your claims or I will continue to assume you are a liar
 
please provide a link to all the libs in congress who want to ban guns.

and yes, many libs support a progressive income tax, as do many conservatives. i also support inheritance taxes, which does not inlolve YOU keeping what you earn.
 
liblady said:
please provide a link to all the libs in congress who want to ban guns.

and yes, many libs support a progressive income tax, as do many conservatives. i also support inheritance taxes, which does not inlolve YOU keeping what you earn.
Click to expand...

why do you support death confiscation taxes

you do realize they deprive me of the right to bequeath what I make how I see fit


Look at who voted for the clinton gun ban-the majority were dems
 
H.R. 1022 [110th]: Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2007 (GovTrack.us)

sponsors of the reinstatement of the clinton gun ban

Cosponsors:
Eleanor Norton [D-DC]
Neil Abercrombie [D-HI1]
Gary Ackerman [D-NY5]
Howard Berman [D-CA28]
Earl Blumenauer [D-OR3]
Robert Brady [D-PA1] Lois Capps [D-CA23]
Yvette Clarke [D-NY11]
William Clay [D-MO1]
Joseph Crowley [D-NY7]
Diana DeGette [D-CO1]
William Delahunt [D-MA10

Rahm Emanuel [D-IL5]
Anna Eshoo [D-CA14]
Sam Farr [D-CA17]
Chaka Fattah [D-PA2]
Bob Filner [D-CA51]
Barney Frank [D-MA4] Raul Grijalva [D-AZ7]
Jane Harman [D-CA36]
Alcee Hastings [D-FL23]
Mazie Hirono [D-HI2]
Rush Holt [D-NJ12]
Michael Honda [D-CA15] Sheila Jackson-Lee [D-TX18]
Henry Johnson [D-GA4]
Patrick Kennedy [D-RI1]
Dennis Kucinich [D-OH10]
James Langevin [D-RI2]


all the rest are dems as well

oops
 
TurtleDude said:
why do you support death confiscation taxes

you do realize they deprive me of the right to bequeath what I make how I see fit


Look at who voted for the clinton gun ban-the majority were dems
Click to expand...
what gun ban? clinton banned guns? as for taxes, i think the inheritance tax is perfectly fine. you do realize the exemption amounts are quite high, right?
 
liblady said:
what gun ban? clinton banned guns? as for taxes, i think the inheritance tax is perfectly fine. you do realize the exemption amounts are quite high, right?
Click to expand...

are you that ignorant

and why is it fine? give me a good argument why it exists in light of high progressive tax rates

why should the government confiscate wealth that has already been taxed and if it is a great idea why not make everyone pay an estate tax rather than a small group who cannot outvote the envious?
 
TurtleDude said:
are you that ignorant

and why is it fine? give me a good argument why it exists in light of high progressive tax rates

why should the government confiscate wealth that has already been taxed and if it is a great idea why not make everyone pay an estate tax rather than a small group who cannot outvote the envious?
Click to expand...
there is no federal gun ban that i know of. our tax rates are not historically high. i would rather see unearned income taxed than wages taxed,
 
liblady said:
there is no federal gun ban that i know of. our tax rates are not historically high. i would rather see unearned income taxed than wages taxed,
Click to expand...

you are rather ignorant

the clinton gun ban expired under Bush but in 1986 the dems tried to derail the McClure Volker firearm protection act by banning for private ownership all automatic firearms made after may 19, 1986. That is a gun ban

We realize you are envious of those who earn lots of money and you want to soak them but you seem unable to make a rational argument

apparently its another case of emotobabbling rather than logic at work
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom