Yes, for equality of opportunity
Yes, for equality of outcome
Yes, for wealth redistribution
Yes, to reduce inequality
No, wealth redistribution is bad
No, it extends the utilitarianism and social contracts in un-useful ways
The idea is that socialist suck huge weinie and so do their ideas, and because they need to use machine guns to implement their ideas, they have to lie all the god damned time.
Socialists whine that libertarians "don't have ideas" simply because the ideas libertarians have work, and don't need machine guns.
The routine complaint from socialists, of course, is that no one else has any ideas because, well, what the hell, only socialists have brains. They don't use them except to construct elaborate lies to cover the failures of their earlier elaborate lies, but what the hell, the socialists believe only those elitists controlling their ideas can think.
Naturally, every time a person threatens the socialist order of things, the very first attack from the socialists is "they're stupid, they don't have any ideas"
Reagan was "senile"
Dan Quayle was "stupid"
GW Bush was a "moron", "idiot", "fool", and clearly dumber than Al Gore or Kerry.
Sarah Palin is just some hick redneck broad from the Alaskan boondocks.
But the Messiah! Well! He be a Hahvahd Law perfesser, don't ya know? He's gots dem ideas, and well, ya know, if it weren't for those dang stupid Republicans he'd have all those laws passed and we'd be rescued! Nobahdy be smahta than Obama!
Republicans and especially Democrats tell people they can be lazy and the politician will still love them and care for them.
People that don't want to grow up are legion. Adults are rare. It's no mystery why libertarians don't win elective office.