- Joined
- Dec 12, 2009
- Messages
- 3,981
- Reaction score
- 385
- Location
- Nun-ya-dang Bidness
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
As I see it, it doesn't matter whether a zygote is an organism or not.
It doesn't matter if a zygote, or any form of it before or afterwards is alive, dead, or somewhere in the middle.
Still, no one would know when the future human actually became...human. And I don't mean in the biological sense. I mean in the sense of "sentience", or whatever. It’s biological “aliveness” has little or no effect on that debate.
If we can't agree on the biological beginning of a being (horse, goat or any other animal including man),... how are we expected to agree on any of the other (some metaphysical) aspects?
I make not bones about my conclusions that the Constitutional applies to the biological "human being" as a "person" and not the metaphysical aspects.
Therefore,... the biology as it applies to when a new human individual is created,... matters.
Last edited: