If you want to do yourself harm then do it but jump off a cliff dont perpetuate a dangerous drug which can harm others.
This same guff was spouted by tobacco smokers 40 years ago.
It seems that they were wrong, children have been made sick by secondary smoke and mothers and fathers have died after many years of smoking.
Tell it to your kids when your in the padded cell.
I am both Pro and Anti-Marijuana.
On one side it really doesn't harm people and people will no longer mix hard drugs with it seeing as drug dealers will be obsolete.
On the other hand, I think people waste the money on it and get lazy. Also if it does in fact kill braincells than it shouldn't be legalized, I don't want to be surrounded by idiots.
Either way the Government hasn't found a good way to make money off of it and won't legalize it.
Last edited by Rufus; 01-10-10 at 06:58 PM.
I just finished off an afternoon bowl---and the affects, seem to make you folks seem smarter, and much better looking, I might add. cheers
"Don't be particular bout nothin, but the company you keep"
I think my point was near enough to the threads title to be able to post it, champ.
You may have observed an idea about a compromise which was the main premise of my argument.
I couldnt be bothered with your argument.
Can't see everyone else lining up to debate with you but I hope they do, you seem desperate.
Last edited by angrybeaver; 01-10-10 at 07:03 PM.
perhaps legalizing a lower thc content marijuana would be an acceptable compromise. i think that it would be largely circumvented, continuing the empowerment of cartels and preventing maximization of tax revenue, but at least it would put a dent in the destruction caused by prohibition. however, you don't seem to recognize the fact that our current policy is harmful, nor do you acknowledge the possibility that marijuana is not as harmful as "reefer madness" would lead you to believe, and that is the problem. it is a shame that people like you are legislators.