- Joined
- Jul 14, 2006
- Messages
- 1,390
- Reaction score
- 328
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
One prediction: The RIAA, MPAA, and BSA will still fail to stop piracy no matter what absurd technical means they try. :mrgreen:
Already happening to some extent, so I think it likely.• Computers are embedded everywhere in the environment, such as inside furniture, jewelry, walls, and clothing.
I think this more likely: "People communicating with their computers via speech and gestures in addition to keyboards."• People communicate with their computers via speech and gestures instead of with keyboards.
Unlikely, IMO.• Household robots are ubiquitous and reliable.
As far as I am aware, retinal implants are already being tested in humans, so that is quite likely. I think testing of spinal implants is also under way, although at a lesser level of advancement.• Retinal implants allow the blind to see, and spinal implants coupled with mechanical legs allow the paralyzed to walk.
If they are aware of them... I think this prediction possible, but not probable.• Pinhead-sized cameras are everywhere, forcing society to reconsider its definition of privacy.
Perhaps. I personally prefer reading an actual book, but who knows?• Computers have made paper books and documents almost completely obsolete.
I doubt this unless major advancements are made. Human contact in learning seems to me to be of high importance. However, I think this prediction likely in a supportive role.• Most learning is accomplished through adaptive courseware presented by computer-simulated teachers.
Perhaps. More likely in my mind for non-verbal conversations. (like IM/texting, etc.).• Language translating machines are of much higher quality, and are routinely used in conversations.
Unlikely, IMO. A novelty, perhaps, or something for those with "interesting" sexual interests, but unlikely to be the preferred medium.• Virtual reality is the preferred sexual medium, since it is convincing, safe, and enhances the experience.
I doubt this. Perhaps in 30 years, but not 10. I personally am currently driving a vehicle at least 10 years old, and unless major changes in job availability (how close to your home , etc.) and travel methods (if more mass transport were put in place, or alternative modes of transportation) occur, it seems likely that a portion of the population will be doing the same in the next 10 years.• Computers do most of the vehicle driving—humans are in fact prohibited from driving on highways unassisted. As a result, there are very few transportation accidents.
At a recent speaking engagement, I was introduced as an “expert”. Scary title, that. At another place I was introduced as "highly experienced" which is a polite way of saying "old".
These put me in mind of Clarke’s Law. Sir Arthur C. Clarke, the inventor of the geostationary satellite, author of innumerable books both non-fiction and science-fiction, and one of the truly forward thinkers of the 20th century. Clarke’s first law has to do with predictions and experts. He came to an interesting conclusion after studying the predictions of experts over the previous centuries. To get you in the right frame of mind, consider some of these real predictions by well respected experts of the past:
I don't think desktop/laptops will become obsolete, I just think products will continue to expand.Here are my thoughts on Kurzweil's predictions:
I agree. The whole concept of a "computer" as a rectangular box that attaches to a keyboard, mouse, and monitor is already becoming obsolete. Is my new Droid a computer or a phone? I think it's both. By the end of the decade, I think it's reasonable that computers would be embedded in places you wouldn't even think to look today.
Nope, sounds good but obnoxiousness to you fellow officemates and privacy will limit its use.I agree. Voice recognition technology has made amazing progress in the last few years, and is quite accurate now.
Robots that are stationary maybe.Ehh...I'm not sure. I guess it depends what counts as a household robot. The Roomba is nice and all, and I'm sure that the technology will continue to improve...but I'm not sure that we'll get there by 2020 for tasks more complicated than vacuuming the floor or mowing the lawn. I really doubt we'll have robots cooking our meals, taking out our trash, and sorting our laundry by the end of the decade.
A bit much to ask, but some progress will be made.I disagree. Unless there is some amazing breakthrough in our understanding of the human brain (which isn't out of the question), I think this will take a lot longer than ten years.
Yeah, without warrants too, right.I agree. The CIA probably already has them.
Books will still be around but improvements in other reading methods will continue to eat away at this market.I don't know about this one. Things only become obsolete when something better comes along, not something newer. Most of the time I'd simply rather have a book than a Kindle document.
Courseware will be added as another tool for the educator.I disagree. While the technology for this may exist by 2020, old habits die hard. I honestly can't foresee 150 years of our education system suddenly collapsing in the next decade just because software is able to do the same thing.
People will continue to drive their own cars, but cars will continue to change.I agree. As I said above, voice recognition technology is already pretty good. Babelfish technology...needs a bit of improvement. But I think we'll get there by the end of the decade.
I disagree. While that would be pretty cool, I doubt it'll happen in ten years. There's a pretty big technological leap between World of Warcraft and The Matrix.
While I think the technology for this will probably exist by the end of the decade (it's already here, to some extent) I don't think it will catch on that quickly...at least in the United States. Our legal system is particularly nasty to companies which make products that injure people. Even if "smart cars" reduced fatalities by 90%, the other 10% would sue the manufacturers.
I read a study a while back on just this issue. The study showed that because of the proliferation of computers in the workplace, the amount of paper generated has increased. The theory is that with computers it is far easier to generate more paperwork than it was before.To me, making papers almost obsolete is the most likely. Its like using candles. A majority of the population uses candles for decoration or non-practical purposes.
Or if candles were to be used for practical purposes, it would be because electricity is out or other forms of light are unavailable. In other words, electricity comes first before candle light.
I would say the same about papers. We will probably get to a point where people use papers for (for a lack of a better word) sentimental value or non-practicality; or like I said, because electricity is not available.
This is especially important for many careers and fields in which papers add burden or slow things down, like a hospital. Since I will be in the medical field, this affects me directly. Keeping track of patients, documentation, legalities, financial info, it should all be on computer if that tech is available.
Next I would say the interactivity of common objects to the point that everything has a computer. Okay not everything, but maybe things like chalkboards, window blinds, the kitchen, doors, things like that. The best example I can think of is in the Bond film "Quantum of Solace," in M's office, one of her assistants is using a computerized table to show information, all controlled by finger touches; no papers, no mess, no clutter, no problem.