"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"
Cicero Marcus Tullius
I'm going to put a foot over the ledge and see how far I drop:
The bar of evil, the standard by which we deem it acceptable to speak ill of the dead/injured, can be applied to one whose sole life outcome/goal was to spread human suffering. By that standard, both Limbaugh and Kennedy would both make very poor candidates. Phelps would be a good one because no positive outcome could possibly arise from his actions.
Have at it.
We always go for that knee jerk reaction. A bomber carries explosives in his shoes and now around 1.5 million Americans are forced to take their shoes off at airports. That must give him a chuckle to know that because of him we have to change our lives.
Fred Phelps dies and you want us to carry fag signs? What good is that?
They would feed off that so much the Phelp clan would be having orgasms in the cemetary.
There are ways to fight these people and that is simply not it. No wonder we can't win a war.
"Don't be particular bout nothin, but the company you keep"
[QUOTE=Blackdog;1058456839]Son of a gun I voted wrong!
I think they are dead and don't care. Say what you want.
Zombie Ted Kennedy will come and get you if you speak ill of the Democratic dead![/QUOTE]
IS he going to kill more innocent women while he is resurrected?......