I voted A because I was unsure if people were going to vote A at all.
My reason for voting A is purely nefarious, as I want to dilute the results.
Apparently, it's not working.
"I do not underestimate the ability of fanatical groups of terrorists to kill and destroy, but they do not threaten the life of the nation. Whether we would survive Hitler hung in the balance, but there is no doubt that we shall survive al-Qa'ida." -- Lord Hoffmann
D ..but only because he hasn't started a war yet.
The first war he starts will earn him an F; just like his predecessors.
obama took over 2 wars and a recession........and 8 years of policy failure.
Originally Posted by johnny_rebson:
These are the same liberals who forgot how Iraq attacked us on 9/11.
A year out he is pretty much doing everything everything he campaigned on, and although it appears we'll never know how far off the Bush economic cliff we could have gone, things seem to be stabilized.
If a HC bill gets passed, troops start returning from Iraq and no itnl. flare-ups such as Iran occur, he'll be sitting pretty for '12.
He gets a C from me. He's held things together well and kept the economic downturn from getting worse, but most of what he's done or is currently trying to do will be hard to judge for a few years until longer-term effects are seen.
If you build a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day.
If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Lucky for him, Republicans don't have an enormously high approval rating. If there were a Repub that was actually new and fresh, he would have a very hard time, but most are just Reagan-wannabes.
It makes me think that if this trend of "not good enough" presidents continues, will we see a third party emergence?