• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does life on other planets disprove the BIble

See OP


  • Total voters
    67
Go back and read what I said.

So you're not rescinding your argument that Noah's fairy tale was a myth about a local event, but aren't going to explain why he rounded up all those animals?



So I guess this...


Means nothing.

You can learn. Just when I was beginning to give up non-existent hope.
 
If the universe is truely infinite, then, at this very moment, there are an infinte number of yous reading an infinte number of these responses..
That's why I said ALMOST.




If everything in the universe was created by the laws of physics, then everything that has happened and everything that will happen is set in stone.

What created the "laws of physics"?

What created the "big bang"?

What set up the energy for the big bang?

No matter how you put it you CANNOT rule out the possibility of their being a God of somekind....
 
Last edited:
So you're not rescinding your argument that Noah's fairy tale was a myth about a local event, but aren't going to explain why he rounded up all those animals?

More fallacy that has nothing to do with my point or the FACT that I disproved your statements with a Little thing called evidence.

Not to mention you try and ignore the point of my argument for some fallacy that has nothing to do with anything.

You can learn. Just when I was beginning to give up non-existent hope.

And this has something to do with you just getting shown to be wrong, how?
 
That's why I said ALMOST.
Indeed.

No matter how you put it you CANNOT rule out the possibility of their being a God of somekind....
Of course not. There is no way to disprove God.

BUT... if you believe that everything in the univese is/was created by the laws of physics, then you cannot escape the reality that all things are set in stone.
 
Last edited:
Indeed.


Of course not. There is no way to disprove God.

BUT... if you believe that everyting in the univese is/was created by the laws of physics, then you cannot escape the reality that all things are set in stone.

Very true.

I will take free will every time.
 
No matter how you put it you CANNOT rule out the possibility of their being a God of somekind....

sure you can.

Since there's not one shred of evidence for the existence of this God character, and since this dude answers no questions and merely increases the complexity of the answers, It really serves no purpose at all.

Then you add in the fact that it's known that religious mania is a mental process, not a physical process, and you suddenly realize that belief in god is mere human irrationality in an otherwise rational universe.

No point in postulating the existence of Sky Pixies until they're needed.

Right now, humanity has a surfeit of gods and too much of it's problems is the result of religious irrationality, be it from Islam, bible thumpers, or socialists.
 
Indeed.


Of course not. There is no way to disprove God.

BUT... if you believe that everything in the univese is/was created by the laws of physics, then you cannot escape the reality that all things are set in stone.

Damn, I wish you people wouldn't pretend to know modern physics.

Please state the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, you may use words, not equations.
 
Indeed.


Of course not. There is no way to disprove God.

BUT... if you believe that everything in the univese is/was created by the laws of physics, then you cannot escape the reality that all things are set in stone.

I have some theories I have been working on but I won't get into it now.

Science and the Universe have always fascinated me and compelled me to constantly learn and research.
 
And this has something to do with you just getting shown to be wrong, how?

has some other poster arrived? I haven't checked the fractionally numbered posts, maybe that how I haven't notice him. Can you post quotes from this newcomer that's doing what you and Goobieman have failed to do?
 
sure you can.

Since there's not one shred of evidence for the existence of this God character, and since this dude answers no questions and merely increases the complexity of the answers, It really serves no purpose at all.

Then you add in the fact that it's known that religious mania is a mental process, not a physical process, and you suddenly realize that belief in god is mere human irrationality in an otherwise rational universe.

No point in postulating the existence of Sky Pixies until they're needed.

Right now, humanity has a surfeit of gods and too much of it's problems is the result of religious irrationality, be it from Islam, bible thumpers, or socialists.


Just because you cannot Comprehend Raptor Jesus, Does not mean he doesn't love you.
 
.

BUT... if you believe that everything in the univese is/was created by the laws of physics, then you cannot escape the reality that all things are set in stone.

Yes the laws of physics are set in stone for OUR universe and for everything AFTER our "big bang".

There is more to it than just a singularity point of the "big bang" (and our universe) because something had to set up the energy for this singularity.

Like I said I have some theories I have been working on but I will not disclose it here and now.
 
Last edited:
sure you can.
Since there's not one shred of evidence for the existence of this God character, and since this dude answers no questions and merely increases the complexity of the answers, It really serves no purpose at all.
You really should not have to be told that absence of proof is not proof of absence.

Then you add in the fact that it's known that religious mania is a mental process, not a physical process, and you suddenly realize that belief in god is mere human irrationality in an otherwise rational universe.
This does nothing to disprove God, as it speaks only to the beings that may believe in Him. Belief in Him, or absence of said belief, does nothing to confirm or deny His existence.

Thus, your attempt to disprove God fails. Miserably.
 
Last edited:
Damn, I wish you people wouldn't pretend to know modern physics.

Please state the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, you may use words, not equations.
How boringly predictable.
 
Last edited:
How boringly predictable.

YES!

Actually expecting you to at least demonstrate a basement level of knowledge of the topics you're spewing on is really too much, but it's necessary anyway.

So, if you haven't heard of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, a true cornerstone of our quantum-based modern society, you should probably google it.
 
You should really try to figure out that if there's no evidence for something, it's ignorant to believe in it anyway.
You said that God could be disproved, and as such, the issue of belief in God is irrelevant.

Your attempt to disprove God failed, as demonstrated.
 
You should really try to figure out that if there's no evidence for something, it's ignorant to believe in it anyway.

No evidence?

You call every culture, tribe, and group of humans (disconnected) around an entire planet that simultaneously believe in a God as no evidence?
 
Last edited:
You said that God could be disproved, and as such, the issue of belief in God is irrelevant.

Your attempt to disprove God failed, as demonstrated.

Please cite my post from which you claim I included the phrase "God could be disproved".

I said God isn't necessary for anything.
 
YES!

Actually expecting you to at least demonstrate a basement level of knowledge of the topics you're spewing on is really too much, but it's necessary anyway.

So, if you haven't heard of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, a true cornerstone of our quantum-based modern society, you should probably google it.
If you knew anything about the subject, you'd see how it has no effect on the issue under discussion.

But then you proudly wallow in your ignorance, so I'll allow you to continue at your leisure.
 
Last edited:
No evidence?

You call every culture, tribe, and group of humans (disconnected) around an entire planet that simultaniously believe in a God as no evidence?

Yes, it's not evidence.

Refer to Philip Wylie's An Essay on Morals if you want a simple discussion of the role instinct plays in the human animal.

Also scroll up the thread to the post where I described the effect of infantile memories on adult behavior, since that's the root of religion.
 
If you knew anything about the subject, you'd see how it has no effect on the issue under discussion.

It has EVERYTHING to do with the fact that your claim that setting the laws of physics in stone eliminates free will is totally refuted by the Uncertainty Principle.

Now, are you capable of expressing the Uncertainty Principle in english words or is modern physics just one more area in which you pop off in total ignorance and don't expect anyone to notice?
 
On the topic of life on other planets and the bible I need to know...

Can we bone aliens? Is there some sort of moral obligation not to?
 
On the topic of life on other planets and the bible I need to know...

Can we bone aliens? Is there some sort of moral obligation not to?

I suppose but only if they consent....and are over 18....:mrgreen:
 
Back
Top Bottom