That's all that was needed.
I purposely selected "rights" people possess today to demonstrate that natural rights can't exist, that they all are lawful rights.
Just because it shatters the foundation of your belief system doesn't make it wrong.
Then they continue arguing with someone else on the same thread as if the rest haven't read of their defeat.
That's pretty dishonest of you.
But you're right. You don't engage in "intellectually dishonest debate", because you stopped debating at that point.