By your logic, the constitution's meaning can be defined by whoever is in power at any given time. This outlook requires a willful ignorance of the constitution. In the passage you just quoted, it states in no uncertain terms that America is to not concern itself with the affairs of others on the international stage.So from my perspective, and I could be forcing this a bit, is that we can assume an aggressive foreign policy to nation build and spread democracy, in geopolitically important areas like the ME, with countries that have the capacity for democracy, like Iraq. It is in our interests.
Would that not be inline with the constitution? Do you have a link which could explain this?