They are too irresponsible to get nothing less than permanent ban from commercial flying
Since it's a first offense they should only get a suspension
They should get a warning
Why all the fuss? Everyone has lapses from time to time
I'd hire them if I had an airline
Something like this is impossible to vote on.
We do not know the complete situation nor the conditions nor the pilots themselves, as men....
We only know what be read...too many sources are biased; others are poorly written...so our opinions are worthless or worse.
Licenses should be yanked......
They were either asleep or they were doing something that impaired their ability to do their job.
And because she alerted them this somehow proves they are asleep, how? Keep reaching man.
"Oh Mom, thank God you’re home. Rallo probably already told you that I was going to the library to get him some new books. But on the way I was mugged by six Al-Qaeda’s. And I said, Oh you don’t Al-Qaeda’s. And I faught ‘em off one by one. I faught off six Al-Qaeda’s!”(May not make any sense if you didn't watch the Cleveland show,basically it is the teenage daughter using a bull **** excuse to her mother for why she wasn't home watching her littler brother)You did not read the whole thing did you?
"Each pilot accessed and used his personal laptop computer while they discussed the airline crew flight scheduling procedure,"
"The first officer, who was more familiar with the procedure, was providing instruction to the captain."Neither pilot said he was aware of where the plane was until a flight attendant called the cockpit about five minutes before the plane was to have landed and asked their estimated time of arrival, the report said.
Probably because those pilots think somehow convincing people that they were doing something else that was distracting/imparing their ability to properly do their jobs will some how get them leniancy.Nothing about sleeping here either.
I got a bridge to sell you.From your own article...
"After landing at Minneapolis-St. Paul, both voluntarily underwent alcohol breath tests, which proved negative, the report said."
No evidence exists that they were impaired in anyway.
Nothing of the sort has been shown even according to your own article. You are jumping to conclusions based on hyped speculation, period.
So far you have shown nothing to back up your accusations at all.
All that means at this point is they were not paying attention, nothing more.
Last edited by jamesrage; 10-28-09 at 10:28 AM.
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"
Cicero Marcus Tullius
No Lives Matter
The pilots keep saying they were discussing policy. Not the airline. Not the Fed. Have you noticed that the investigators are usually the ones to deliver the facts, and in this case the investigators are silent?
Last edited by Jerry; 10-28-09 at 11:03 AM.
So far they have done nothing that would call the story they submitted into question.
They said they were discussing airline policy.
What does the Fed have to do with what I said?
No Lives Matter