- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Oh my, isn't this funny; the forums intellects admitting they don't comprehend a simple concept as breach of contract in a desperate effort to avoid substantive debate.
Here let me help you N the Capt’n; it means not meeting the terms of a legal contract.
For those of you who have difficulty with reading comprehension that would mean that if you enter into a "promise" with another party in either a writing, which is definitely the case with an Insurance agreement, or verbally and then break those promises, you are in breach of contract.
Hope that helped ya'll.
So what Void asked as pretty simple without all the efforts to obfuscate the issue with blather; who are you going to go to for remedy if your contract is within a Government run plan? The answer is obvious to anyone who doesn’t willfully try to wallow in denial.
On the contrary, the current system, that of your insurance company not honoring their promise, does allow a remedy within our system of courts.
:rofl
Thank you. You just proved that Voidwar's "breach of contract" and my description of "denial of benefits" are identical.
If you have a problem with either an insurance company or a government plan, you go the exact same route.
Who would have thought that TD would have helped clarify things for Voidwar? :lol: