- Joined
- Jul 9, 2009
- Messages
- 4,111
- Reaction score
- 1,605
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
You're right. Pro-choice should be called "pro-abortion rights" and pro-life should be renamed "pro-human rights" or "pro right to live".I do not consider myself "pro-choice", but as "pro abortion rights". I think the terms "pro-life" and "pro-choice" are euphemisms used by those afraid of the word abortion.
What makes you believe the government will not be focused on profit? If they don't seek to make a profit, the program will bankrupt itself or become a burden on this country, draining our cash and adding to the national debt.I trust the government more than an insurance company who is focused on profit.
And the government DOES want money. Hence the 27th amendment. If you honestly think that government cares more for you than themselves then you need to wake up. They are just as greedy and hungry for power and money as corporations. To deny this is playing right into their hands.
I honestly don't understand why people believe that government programs can be successful if they don't actually make any money yet spend trillions. How can such a program be deemed successful?
Last edited: