No. It's a Constitutional Right & no regulatioins are acceptable.
Yes. Reasonable regulations are acceptable.
A law abiding citizen should have the right to own & carry full auto weapons.
A law abiding citizen should have the right to own & carry flame throwers.
A law abiding citizen should have the right to own & carry tactical nukes.
gun restrictions are necessary to prevent unauthorized use by nuts.
.30cal is a "round", as in 7.62x63 or .30-06.
7.62mm bullet size is a "caliber", as in "a bullet with a 7.62mm diameter".
And, just to note, while 7.62x39 is nominally a 7.62mm round, the bullets are actually .311" diameter, same as in the UK's .303 and Japan's 7.7mm weapons.
are all .30Cal rounds.
So his usage of the term .30Cal for an M-60 is absolutly correct as the M-60 uses a .308 which is a .30Cal round. Even the Army calls it a .30 Cal round.
I don't know why you even mentioned the use of the term round as it did not apply to anything you are Devil505 said.
This site has the details...
Nammo AS - 7.62mm (.30 Cal)
None of this has anything to do with his ridicules responses about gun rights, but technically as I said he was correct on the ammo type and weapon.
Last edited by Black Dog; 09-01-09 at 09:09 AM.
No Lives Matter
That 40% embrace the Constitution so and believe that no gun restrictions are necessary - this is scary..
Either these people are obtuse or they really hold this to be dear..
I'd say that in a modern society, the guns are not necessary.
But do we have a "modern" society ?
The people at the "town hall" meetings say NO.