Now, however, you're asking loaded questions in place of addressing the points of my argument.
You don't have a right to unconventional weapons. You never did.
Your question is dubious in that it's based on a false premise. The 2nd never did grant you the right to just any weapon at all. Since you never had the right to Nukes, I have no issue with the state telling you "no".
"Arms" never meant "all weapons".