• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is health care in the US a right?

Is health care a right?


  • Total voters
    53
  • Poll closed .
I didn't see any reason to go beyond his first statement, which was so blatantly wrong/immoral that I went no further in his post.
Words are important...That's all we have in these forums so.......Proofread a bit

I bolded part of your statement.

If you believe such, you should have read his whole post, which would then have given you pause before jumping upon his first statement.
 
I didn't see any reason to go beyond his first statement, which was so blatantly wrong/immoral that I went no further in his post.
Words are important...That's all we have in these forums so.......Proofread a bit

You have got to be kidding. :roll:

That is so moronic and blatantly dishonest it is not even laughable.
 
You have got to be kidding. :roll:

That is so moronic and blatantly dishonest it is not even laughable.

I think it was pretty obviously the truth. Why would I have posted what I did if I understood your real meaning?

Example:

If I start a post saying "All Protestants should be shot!"

& then go on for a number of paragraphs with a totally different meaning, who's fault is it if someone jumps on my first sentence & responds to it?



Here is you original post again:
No reason exist in this country for the people to have reasonably priced health care.

Really is not unusually considering some of your other posts about HC in general.
 
Last edited:
I think it was pretty obviously the truth. Why would I have posted what I did if I understood your real meaning?

I was talking about this...

"Words are important...That's all we have in these forums so.......Proofread a bit" - Devil505

So buy your own statement obviously words are not that important to you.

"I didn't see any reason to go beyond his first statement, which was so blatantly wrong/immoral that I went no further in his post." - Devil505

If they were you would have read the whole thing.
 
I think it was pretty obviously the truth. Why would I have posted what I did if I understood your real meaning?

Example:

If I start a post saying "All Protestants should be shot!"

& then go on for a number of paragraphs with a totally different meaning, who's fault is it if someone jumps on my first sentence & responds to it?

The poster who is so limited in thinking and blind to anything other than their own point of view, they don't care what the real meaning behind a statement is.

So it would be the poster who did not bother to read.
 
The poster who is so limited in thinking and blind to anything other than their own point of view, they don't care what the real meaning behind a statement is.

So it would be the poster who did not bother to read.


You made the error my friend, not me.;)
 
Really is not unusually considering some of your other posts about HC in general.

I challenge you to point out where I have said anything even close or even implied it.

I know you can't, but I will give you a shot.
 
You made the error my friend, not me.;)

You both made a frikkin error.

Blackdog, by incorrectly stating his point. Or perhaps not proofreading enough.

Devil505, by not thoroughly reading the post of Blackdog.
 
The dishonesty of your posts says it all.

Have a good night.


Your (below)statement does fit in with many of your other posts on this thread, so one would assume you meant it....as typed:

No reason exist in this country for the people to have reasonably priced health care.



No one has a right to a heart transplant or cancer treatment.

And what does that have to do with anything? They also believed in a little thing called personal responsibility. Something most liberals have forgotten. They did not expect people to be given food, shelter etc for free either.
 
Last edited:
You both made a frikkin error.

Blackdog, by incorrectly stating his point. Or perhaps not proofreading enough.

Devil505, by not thoroughly reading the post of Blackdog.

hey.........Don't try to stop us from having a little "Sparring" fun!!:lol:
 
I challenge you to point out where I have said anything even close or even implied it.

I know you can't, but I will give you a shot.


No reason exist in this country for the people to have reasonably priced health care.



No one has a right to a heart transplant or cancer treatment.

And what does that have to do with anything? They also believed in a little thing called personal responsibility. Something most liberals have forgotten. They did not expect people to be given food, shelter etc for free either.



Here's a few just from this thread alone.
 
Here's a few just from this thread alone.

They are not even close. :roll:

More lies, oh well. It's either that or I think you really do have a problem with reading as you have shown many times before.
 
They are not even close. :roll:

More lies, oh well. It's either that or I think you really do have a problem with reading as you have shown many times before.

More lies?

You did not post those statements?
(Perhaps someone is sneaking onto this site & posting in your name???)
 
Last edited:
You have the right to have your health cared for..... granted you have the means to afford the care provided.

The government does not have the authority to provide health care or assistance for individuals not employed by the government.
 
You have the right to have your health cared for..... granted you have the means to afford the care provided.

The government does not have the authority to provide health care or assistance for individuals not employed by the government.

And yet they do.
 
You have the right to have your health cared for..... granted you have the means to afford the care provided.

The government does not have the authority to provide health care or assistance for individuals not employed by the government.

So medicare and medicaid are wrong in your opinion? LOL, i m sorry to say, but it is highly unlikely that private insurance companies are just jumping for joy to the thought of senior care moving from public to private.
 
And yet they do.

The government has stuck its nose in alot of issues that it doesn't belong in, Constitutionally speaking.
 
Back
Top Bottom