The one way solution does not exist. It depends on the location and on the conditions if you can use geothermal energy or hydro power in an effective manner.
I think coal plants and nuclear plants cannot be substituted completely in the near future, but we should invest in all of the options you gave.
Rather dead than red!
This is not to say there is no room for nuclear, there is room for a limited amount of all the mentioned options, I think wind is the most under used right now.
We all live under the same sky, but we don't all have the same horizon
Yes, diversity is key to creating a sustainable energy policy, but I think nuclear is the most promising.This is not to say there is no room for nuclear, there is room for a limited amount of all the mentioned options...
That's because it's not viable on a large scale, at all. Used selectively and intelligently wind power could be used to great benefit but there's no reason to believe it's the most under utilized....I think wind is the most under used right now.
If just one, I'd invest into nuclear. It's probably the one which can most widely be implemented. Things such as solar or wind are very regionally dependent.
You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville