• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is your religion?

What is your religion?


  • Total voters
    132
It has everything to do with what you said.

Please point out how?

My claim was that you cannot tell whether somebody has cheated or whether it's a mere forum-guest voting in a poll by looking at the numbers of votes and the numbers of the shown users.

And my claim is yes you can. Even the make up of population in general will tell you that.

What makes you declare it as 'cheating' and not as 'guest-voting', since both values carry the same results?
What is it that I've missed which makes you so certain that someone has been cheating in the poll?

When one "value" all of a sudden jumps up out of nowhere by almost 1/3rd compared to all the rest, we can use Occam's razor and call shenanigans.

Common sense vs wishful thinking.
 
Last edited:
Please point out how?
You have stated that "The smart ones know that the majority of anonymous voters above say 4 or 5 at most are people logging out and clearing cookies to vote numerous times."

To which I replied with: "How do you know the smart ones know that?
Did you make a poll?"

The conclusion is that my words were indeed directly related to yours, contrary to your claim that my words had nothing to do with yours.
And my claim is yes you can. Even the make up of population in general will tell you that.
Then how can you tell what unregistered votes are the result of a guest that voted in the poll and what unregistered votes are the result of cheating?
Please do explain.
When one "value" all of a sudden jumps up out of nowhere by almost 1/3rd compared to all the rest, we can use Occam's razor and call shenanigans.

Common sense vs wishful thinking.
That's far from being common sense, and if it is, it is the rare sense that should be applauded.

One value gaining more unregistered votes than another means not that the value had cheaters manipulating it.
Especially not when this value is the highest value among the values listed.
Logic simply escapes this claim.
 
Last edited:
Unitarianism.

  • the belief in One God and the oneness or unity of God (in contrast to the Trinity).
  • the life and teachings of Jesus Christ is the exemplar model for living one's own life.
  • that reason, rational thought, science, and philosophy coexist with faith in God.
  • that man has the ability to exercise free will in a responsible, constructive and ethical manner
  • the belief that human nature in its present condition is neither inherently corrupt nor depraved (see Original Sin), but capable of both good and evil, as God intended.
  • the conviction that no religion can claim an absolute monopoly on the Holy Spirit or theological truth.
  • the belief that, though the authors of the Bible were inspired by God, they were humans and therefore subject to human error.
  • the rejection of traditional doctrines that they believe malign God's character or veil the true nature and mission of Jesus Christ, such as the doctrines of predestination, eternal damnation, and the vicarious sacrifice or satisfaction theory of the Atonement.
 
When one "value" all of a sudden jumps up out of nowhere by almost 1/3rd compared to all the rest, we can use Occam's razor and call shenanigans.

Common sense vs wishful thinking.
I think Occam's Razor would cut your silly theory to shreds. It's far simpler to believe that guests are voting in this poll than to believe that the atheists of this board are conspiring to rig a poll by signing out and voting anonymously.

:tocktock2
 
Back
Top Bottom