View Poll Results: What things should protesters be removed or arrested for?

Voters
32. You may not vote on this poll
  • Shouting down speakers so that no one can hear the person speaking.

    12 37.50%
  • Intimidation(Verbal threats,pointing weapons or projectiles at someone)

    30 93.75%
  • Blocking entrances to buildings and events.

    25 78.13%
  • Rioting.

    31 96.88%
  • Throwing things at the opposition or anyone else.

    31 96.88%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: What should protesters be removed or arrested for?

  1. #21
    Sage
    Arcana XV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Geneva, Switzerland and Rochester, NY
    Last Seen
    10-22-17 @ 10:25 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    6,412

    Re: What should protesters be removed or arrested for?

    They should be removed for all of the options in the poll.

    People should only be arrested for the Rioting and Throwing things option if they destroy public or private property and if the things they're throwing could potentially injure someone badly.
    "Yes, but are you a Protestant atheist or a Catholic atheist?".- Northern Irish joke

  2. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Last Seen
    12-23-09 @ 05:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    616

    Re: What should protesters be removed or arrested for?

    stupid poll.

    the answer is none of the above - protesters should not be arrested.

    protesters should be treated like everybody else. you punch somebody in the face - you get arrested. you don't punch anybody - you don't get arrested.

  3. #23
    Sage
    jamesrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A place where common sense exists
    Last Seen
    12-10-17 @ 09:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    31,067

    Re: What should protesters be removed or arrested for?

    Quote Originally Posted by NEUROSPORT View Post
    stupid poll.

    the answer is none of the above - protesters should not be arrested.

    protesters should be treated like everybody else. you punch somebody in the face - you get arrested. you don't punch anybody - you don't get arrested.

    SO basically your saying that what ever of those 5 things are crimes then they should be arrested for those things that are crimes and not arrested for things that are not crimes?
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"

    Cicero Marcus Tullius

  4. #24
    Tavern Bartender
    Constitutionalist
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:49 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    76,323

    Re: What should protesters be removed or arrested for?

    All except the first probably are against the law already, and I'm not sure about the first.
    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •