• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How much more would you pay for laissez faire property?

How much more would you pay for laissez faire property?

  • Up to 20% more.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Up to 30% more.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Up to 40% more.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Up to 50% more.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Up to 60% more.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Up to 80% more.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Up to 100% more (double).

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Over 100% more (specify amount).

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5
You mean, how much MORE would I pay?" That is, assuming that my own property was also laissez faire.

No, that's not exactly how things work. The entire point of zoning law is to stabilize property value.

Property next to laissez faire property will always be worth less than property next to property with an average amount of restrictions.
 
There is probably more, a lot more to this $1,000.00 mandated percolation test and excessive fee.

I expect the truth only from me, no one else.

No question.... many bureaucrats and people do not know when to stop.
Its also true that they do not know when to start.

Or would you enjoy living on Love Canal, New York State, as I recall ??
Don't like regulations ?
Go live on the Moon :rofl
 
You mean, how much MORE would I pay?" That is, assuming that my own property was also laissez faire.

If he appreciated his property's value and sincerely upheld the live and let live doctrine, that neighbor would be a valuable asset and an enhancement to my own property's value. He would stand by me in future proposals to impose regulations.

It is kind of a silly question, isn't it?

You are certainly free to pay me a lot more than the appraiser says my property is worth, but he/she will take into consideration the unsightly nature of my neighbor's activities on their property and appraise accordingly.

But come on down, or up, to Maine ...have I got a deal for you!
 
A lot of people fall for "reasonable." Unfortunately, you can't precisely define it in legal terms. It is the nature of government to overregulate and add to the misery. Let the camel stick his nose under your tent, and the next thing you see is him inside defecating all over your $500,000 Persian rug.

The potential is always there.

But no regulation whatsoever would cause issues.

I prefer the minimum regulation needed, and no more.

Not that such ever has happened, nor is it likely to.

I want to be protected from criminals and government intrusions.

Technically, one could argue that being protected from criminals is a government intrusion.
 
Back
Top Bottom