View Poll Results: what % of the time are conspiracy theorists right ?

Voters
20. You may not vote on this poll
  • 100%

    0 0%
  • 80%

    2 10.00%
  • 60%

    0 0%
  • 40%

    0 0%
  • 20%

    9 45.00%
  • 0%

    9 45.00%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Conspiracy Theories

  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Last Seen
    12-23-09 @ 05:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    616

    Re: Conspiracy Theories

    Quote Originally Posted by The Mark View Post
    If we are speaking in terms of conspiracy theories, then I have so far heard no evidence which convinces me that anything other than that which is the accepted truth (I.E., that planes ran into and damaged the WTC towers to the extent that they collapsed and damaged the area around them. Further, that this collapse caused the surrounding buildings to collapse/take major damage.)
    if you don't understand the problems with the collapses on 9-11 then hopefully you don't have any engineering degrees like i do.

    by the way most conspiracy theorists don't really understand the physics involved either. to an extent their belief is as blind as yours.

    to ME the giveaway is the symmetrical nature of the collapse into the path of greatest resistance which was the case for ALL THREE BUILDINGS. this flies in the face of the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

    its hard to say what should be the giveaway for a regular person considering that a regular person is completely brain dead.
    Last edited by NEUROSPORT; 08-06-09 at 08:33 AM.

  2. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Last Seen
    12-23-09 @ 05:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    616

    Re: Conspiracy Theories

    Quote Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
    He's operating under the false assumption that sun-spot activity definitely has no effect on the temperature of the Earth. He is merely implying that AGW theory is iron clad and that any alternative theories constitute arguments of a "conspiracy theory" quality.

    Because everyone KNOWS that CO2 is to blame for the minuscule rise (about one point three degrees Fahrenheit) in average global temps from the late 1800's to 1998, when temps ceased rising and actually began to fall in 2002, and have been falling ever since, which just so happens to be contemporaneous with a deep solar minimum (prolonged minimal sun spot activity). Not saying that constitutes some kind of causal link but it's an intriguing coincidence nonetheless.

    Statements such as the OP's are why I've come to harbor a special contempt for AGW theory doomsayers.
    my OP was 100% sarcasm in case that was not obvious.

    let me spell out for you what i really think happened:

    1 - Oswald was a nobody just like the retard who was blamed for burning down Reichstag. He was selected to take the blame PRECISELY BECAUSE he did not actually know ANYTHING about the real reasons why JFK was killed and therefore could not spill it. JFK was asassinated by a team of killers hired by the government who opened fire simultaneously from several strategic positions.

    2 - Global warming is caused by sun spot activity. Sun spot activity is the cause. Carbon dioxide increase is the SIDE EFFECT of global warming. While humans contribute carbon dioxide they are far from being the only source. In fact carbon dioxide is central to LIFE on earth. It is the mechanism by which energy is transfered between living things. Ultimately the balance of carbon dioxide is simply determined by the temperature of the earth. Its THAT SIMPLE.

    3 - USA went to Iraq because both Bush and Cheney were in the oil business and wanted profits for their buddies. Also neo-con is just a different name for zionist. zionists want strategic control of the middle east to ensure favorable conditions for Israel. american taxpayer got stuck with the bill for bailing out Israel and Bush's cronies.

    4 - All three buildings on 9-11 were imploded using thermite explosives. But this is far from obvious in case of WTC1 and WTC2 as indeed the plane impacts were quite spectacular. however there was nothing wrong with WTC7 except for tiny fires which a 5 year old could put out with a water gun so it is quite obvious that WTC7 was imploded. WTC1 and 2 were imploded too but that part is frankly irrelevant. In fact that 9-11 truth movement should have never even mentioned that aspect ( implosion of the twins ) as it only serves to confuse the already feeble-minded lemmings.

    5 - i think that reptilian stuff is COMPLETE BULL**** !
    Last edited by NEUROSPORT; 08-06-09 at 08:53 AM.

  3. #23
    Frankernaut peepnklown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    California
    Last Seen
    10-16-15 @ 04:01 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    607

    Re: Conspiracy Theories

    By definition, conspiracies happen all the time.
    'The whole universe is going to die!'

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •