- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
- Messages
- 19,883
- Reaction score
- 5,120
- Location
- 0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
I agree the definition is retarted in the sense of US law. But thems the facts. However, the initial definition calls for a magazine or belt. I also answered your snide question about a Steyr, putting you in your rightful place.
Only on the basis of the dumb machine gun definition. Changing a part that is defined as a machinegun makes it a machine gun. You did not explain to actually turn a bullpit rifle into what is commonly believed to be a machine gun, something belt fed. I actually specifically picked that because turning a bullpit into a belt fed requires massive engineering.
As for the Economics forum. Most of that crap bores me. This is why I have a staff of accountants for both my business and personal. I am far to rich to count my own money. I have "the help" do it. Anyway, I am in there time to time, But I don't start dumb threads that demonstrate a fundamental ignorance on a topic simply to get off on some hoplophobic hard-on. :lol::2wave:
Actually the point of the thread was to see who thought that the average citizen should be allowed to have VX, Ebola and Nuclear weapons. You should look up the discussion with Voidwar. He thinks that the average citizen should be allowed to have those three. You assume too much. And I seriously doubt you have your own business. But that's neither here nor there.