• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Which Will Be The More Populer Argument?

Which will be the more populer argument?


  • Total voters
    12
Tiller specialized in specifically doing abortions on women over 22 weeks gestation.
Abortion is legal under certain circumstances after 22 WEEKS. States have made exceptions to thier bans on late term abortion when the woman's life was at stake and when some other dire circumstances prevailed.
 
Maybe he was talking about elephants. Ya never know. :2wave:

.
You're on the right track...I was..ummm...talking about uhhh......the Dogfish!.....yeah....that's it....the Dogfish....they have a 24 month gestation cycle...one of the longest in the animal kingdom.
 
Abortion is legal under certain circumstances after 22 WEEKS. States have made exceptions to thier bans on late term abortion when the woman's life was at stake and when some other dire circumstances prevailed.

Yes it is. If there is "irreversible risk of maternal health" however given that drs. don't have to detail out what that irreversible risk is and simply just have to sign off on the abortion the legislation is meaningless, has no accountability, and completely unregulated. Might as well have no time limit at all since it is simply a matter of the drs. conscious on whether he feels like signing off on it or not. He will never have to go to court and prove - I did this abortion at this many weeks gestation for this specific health risk.

Ain't law grand? Gotta love those loopholes.
 
I hope Roeder gets the maximum sentence under the law for what he did to Dr. Tiller. Anyone who is truly pro-life would condemn such actions, even against those who perform abortions. Disgusting.
 
I wonder if any pro-life DP member is willing to adopt a child with severe mental retardation? or massive physical limitations?

It is one thing to stand on the sidelines and criticize, it is another to care for a helpless being 24/7.
 
I wonder if any pro-life DP member is willing to adopt a child with severe mental retardation? or massive physical limitations?

It is one thing to stand on the sidelines and criticize, it is another to care for a helpless being 24/7.

In my experience, the harshest criticisms of my positions come from people who are doing just that.
 
I wonder if any pro-life DP member is willing to adopt a child with severe mental retardation? or massive physical limitations?
Three generations of imbeciles are enough then?
 
In my experience, the harshest criticisms of my positions come from people who are doing just that.

just which? stand on the sidelines and criticize,or care for a helpless person 24/7?
 
just which? stand on the sidelines and criticize,or care for a helpless person 24/7?

Sorry, I should have been clearer. People who care for helpless persons, either their own children or people who work in the rehabilitation industry.
 
I am old enough to know lots of people who have had to care for damaged children, and some have had to turn the responsibility over to others. Those who are a danger to themselves or others need the kind of care that a family cannot provide.
It would not be that hard a decision to make, for me, to abort such a child, if I knew in advance that the child would have to be eventually institutionalized for those reasons...
A life of such torment, IMO, is cruelty....
 
Back
Top Bottom