- Joined
- Sep 22, 2005
- Messages
- 11,430
- Reaction score
- 2,282
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
That would be relevant how?
Running some figures, lets assume that 10% of the 5600 person force was female.
Therefore, the impact of 108 pregnancies to that unit would be 19%, not 2%, and the impact of the pregnancy on the males of the unit was 0%.
Now, I just assumed the number of females was 10%, if the number was smaller, more than 20% of the females in the unit were disabled.
That's significant.