What does that have to do with anything? You stated that criminals typically flee from the police. Sometimes, yes. Sometimes, no. In some circumstances, criminals TARGET the police.Cite an earlier post in which I stated that criminals were specifically trained in combat.
I'd say I know precisely as much as you do.You don't know much about soldiering, do you?
Of course it doesn't make sense to you, you've never served with females as equals. Others here have, and have different perceptions.The case I made that you're choosing to adress via ad hominem attacks is that copping ain't sojering, and that the copping industry has a niche market that makes putting split tails on the force a sensible option for certain circumstances. There are no niches in the sojering industry, infantry, in which it makes sense to employ females.
Ad hominems aside, your experiences don't speak to this issue very well.
That's correct. The phyical requirements for the males were watered down to make it possible to retain enough females to meet EEO quota requirements, just like they did with the cops and with the fire departments.
Prove that these exist. What percentage of females are police departments required to hire to meet their "quotas"? And by whom?