This is a poll nobody could possibly be authoritarian on an answer.It is gonna bepend on Obamas reaction to unforeseen events.
The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority. The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority. The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking.
"Gold gets dug out of the ground in Africa, or someplace. Then we melt it down, dig another hole, bury it again and pay people to stand around guarding it. It has no utility. Anyone watching from Mars would be scratching their head."
- Warren Buffett
It's a friggin' definition, not an argument.
No mention of stealing.. of or pertaining to the United States of America or its inhabitants: an American citizen.
2. of or pertaining to North or South America; of the Western Hemisphere: the American continents.
3. of or pertaining to the aboriginal Indians of North and South America, usually excluding the Eskimos, regarded as being of Asian ancestry and marked generally by reddish to brownish skin, black hair, dark eyes, and prominent cheekbones.
4. a citizen of the United States of America.
5. a native or inhabitant of the Western Hemisphere.
6. an Indian of North or South America.
7. American English.
8. a steam locomotive having a four-wheeled front truck, four driving wheels, and no rear truck.
Course, we as a country do not steal either, so it's all a moot point. I suspect you are referring to taxes,which is not stealing.
You can't be referring to Bush, the major regulatory and Constitutional failures the caused the banking meltdown were enacted under Democrats, every single one.
The Iraq war, though I opposed the invasion, was actually a success.
Overall, Bush failed to kiss European ass, which is the best thing a president can do, and he successfully ignored the efforts of the lunatic left to destroy the American way of life via silly environmental panic responses.
Overall, we weren't in that bad a shape when he left office, outside of what you have to expect from a mostly liberal presidency, ie, too much spending.
And you people aren't going to admit that too much spending is the major failure of the US governemnt, not while your Holy Leader has his hands on the cows tits, are you? All his pals are standing out there with their mouths gaping open hoping for a squirt of fresh green juice from the money cow, right now.
FDR made the economy worse after Hoover.
JFK was such an embarassment someone in the US government had him shot, or so many of the more credible story lines go. He was replaced by a flaming socialist that enacted programs that wasted roughly twelve trillion dollars in the forty year period from 1965 or so.
Clinton's foreign policy was a shambles after Bush, his domestic programs were slapped back in his face by a Democrat dominated Congress, both Hillary Care and Kyoto were rejected soundly by Houses of Congress his party controlled. He dragged us into more unnecessary disparate foreign conflicts than any president before or since. He failed to seize the advantages offered by the collapse of the Evil Empire and his administrations policies led directly to the attacks on September 11, 2001.
The Repbulicans, not the Democrats, passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, to cite on of the landmark legislative achievements of the last century.
The Republican president had the vision to push the Soviet Union off their economic cliff. He came into office because the preceding Democrat was cowering in terror before the thought of saying unkind words about the free world's mortal enemy.
Yeah. You had what could have been a single point example, except I demolished it.
I have the history of every Democrat that followed a Republican into the White House in the last century, and I've got you Messiah to point to, also.