• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should parents be allowed to refuse life saving treatment for their children?

So, should parents be allowed to refuse life saving treatment for their children?


  • Total voters
    49
I'm just glad the kid is back home. I hope that all involved can unite in doing what is best for this young man now, so that he can focus on beating his cancer.

He doesn't want the treatment.

I guess it's only "your body, your choice" when you're a girl.
 
Needs to be a case by case basis, IMO. Can't be black and white.

I definitely think that the child should be able to decide for themselves,however. As in the most recent case to hit the news. He doesn't want chemo, he shouldn't have chemo. I wouldn't have it either, so I would completely fight for his right to not be forced to have poison put into his body.
 
Can't we have a separate list for liberals, I hate being on the same list as ADK. :mrgreen:

Admit it, you love it. This way you get to be on the "right" team without pissing off the big neo-con mouths in here. :2wave:
 
He doesn't want the treatment.

I guess it's only "your body, your choice" when you're a girl.

Looks like you missed the post I made earlier on this thread:
In general, the government should not interfere with a parent's decision regarding their child's medical treatment. If parental choice is questionable in cases like this one, an assessment of the child's cognitive development should be made to ensure he or she understands the implications of refusing treatment. If he or she is competent to make that choice, it should be respected.

In this particular case, there are too many unanswered questions and I believe it was right for the court to intervene.

The kid wanted to return home, likely knowing that he would probably be ordered to take the treatments, hence it was indeed his choice.
 
He doesn't want the treatment.

He's been brainwashed by his parents and their retarded religious beliefs.

I guess it's only "your body, your choice" when you're a girl.

Only after you're a legal adult, then it gets to be your choice. Before that, society has a say.
 
While there are a multitude of incidents over the past couple years, here is a recent one about parents are refusing to allow chemotherapy on their kid and the kid appears to be ignorant of the situation.

Judge rules family can't refuse chemo for boy

The kid is pretty much a goner without the treatment.

So, should parents be allowed to refuse life saving treatment for their children?

[EDIT] Based on Etheral's insightful marks, assume at least for the discussion that the medical live saving treatment is medically sound and likely to save the child's life [/EDIT]

In this particular case, in this instance, I believe the judge and others were right to step in.

Over the past few days I've been doing some digging about the Nemenhah Band and their claims. No way would it be appropriate if this had been a legitimate Indigenous group with legitimate healers working with the boy. I've seen healers who've worked "miracles" after the MD types have given up.

The problem with this group is that they took it upon themselves to adopt a name, adopt a lifestyle and proclaim themselves some kind of "born again" Indians and proceeded to use legitimate healing ceremonies as their own, adapting them ie changing them.

Spiritual, medicinal healers would NEVER do such a thing. NOR would they then turn around and charge others for their services.

So, I confirmed that their legitimacy is bogus as is their "Indian-ness" via the moccasin telegraph.

I've spoken with several healers I know personally about this and they've confirmed what I know about healers and healing in our communities. You can't just go to a workshop/weekend retreat and become one of those jiffy pop shamans we're always battling. Healing, being a Healer takes years, like lifelong years, of training. That kind of knowledge is thousands of years old and was learned in a context of time and space. There are songs, dances, things of the natural world, plant peoples and the harvest of those plants (which also have their own ceremony and song and proper harvesting and use) for various ailments. Those things and that knowledge is embedded in our languages.

When people try to take that knowledge and use it without the proper cultural context, they can hurt someone. Spirituality and healing can exist within those outside of our communities and they are then encouraged and helped to learn what they need to know to use those gifts properly. Without that, they can and will hurt someone by opening doors, touching the web of the healer's path without the knowledge of what to do next and how to properly, respectfully harness those powers of universe.

It would be like someone watching an MD doc on tv and then going out to perform brain surgery.

The judge was right to step in and get this boy medical care. Usually, there are Healers who work in conjunction with MD types. Using the tools of both worlds would have given this boy an even greater chance of survival. It's unfortunate, in their ignorance, his parents didn't choose that path.
 
Back
Top Bottom