• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If you oppose same-sex marriage, you are...

If you oppose same-sex marriage, are you...

  • Total voters
    34
Dav said:
Being a bigot means hating those who are different, right?Well, that applies to hating those who have different points of view as well.
Click to expand...

The old 'intolerant of the intolerant' fallacy. I'm not stopping you from following your beliefs. You're welcome to follow your religion and enforce on those who are members of it. The moment you try to push legislation banning the marriages of people who are not part of your religion and do not want to take part in your rituals of marriage from getting married then you're on the wrong side of the pool. Please stop this? This argument has been made countless times over and over again by people way smarter then you. And every single time they had nothing substantial to say and kept saying nothing more then 'you're being bigoted against my bigotry!' - If my argument was about forcing the Catholic Church to recognize same sex marriage then you'd have some sort of point. However since that is not my argument yours is just nothing more then the same old rhetoric Navy Pride use to spread.
 
Last edited:
Hatuey said:
And on what basis would you not want the mixing of races? Please tell me. ;) I love this white washing of racism. It's the MO of Stormfront members.
Click to expand...

Because they like the race they are and don't feel they should mix? That is not racist, and it is moronic to call it otherwise. It has literally nothing to do with being superior or hate.

I already gave you the dictionary meaning. Actually read it this time.

Hatuey said:
REALLY? But not the other one? I wonder why this is true but the other isn't. Are you by any chance poor?
Click to expand...

You have got to be kidding.

Hatuey said:
Really? On what basis would you oppose Muslim/Christian marriages?
Click to expand...

I don't, and most Jews will not marry non-Jews. Does this now make them bigots as well? Not really.

Hatuey said:
Funny how you proved my point.
Click to expand...

I proved how asinine it is.

Hatuey said:
Oh cry me a f'n river. If you don't want to be called a bigot. Don't act like one. Simple. :)
Click to expand...

Everyone is a bigot in the true sense of the word on some level, everyone including you.
 
Cilogy said:
I have 5 words for you: Iowa, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maine.
Click to expand...

I have 45 for you.

Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

Interestingly enough none of the 5 words you mentioned put it to a vote. I wonder why that was?
 
Blackdog said:
Because they like the race they are and don't feel they should mix?
Click to expand...

Why though? You're avoiding my question. Why do they feel like races shouldn't mix?

That is not racist, and it is moronic to call it otherwise. It has literally nothing to do with being superior or hate.
Click to expand...

You're being intellectually dishonest and using the same old Stormfront white washing of what is racism.

I already gave you the dictionary meaning. Actually read it this time.
Click to expand...

Glad you brought up the fact that you gave the dictionary definition :

3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
Click to expand...

If you do not feel races should mix you're not being intolerant of other races? Why are you playing semantics?

You have got to be kidding.
Click to expand...

You're the one who must think we're stupid.

I don't, and most Jews will not marry non-Jews. Does this now make them bigots as well?
Click to expand...

Yes.

I proved how asinine it is.
Click to expand...

You proved nothing. You white washed the definition of racism to suit your agenda.

Everyone is a bigot in the true sense of the word on some level, everyone including you.
Click to expand...

Not really. I could care less what you do with your life as long as A) It's consensual B) It doesn't bother me. Thanks for asking!
 
Hatuey said:
Why though? You're avoiding my question. Why do they feel like races shouldn't mix?
Click to expand...

Ummm... Maybe they actually like there own race like I said before. Maybe they feel half breed children have it rougher in life (stupid reason, but I know people who think this). Maybe they just don't find other races attractive. Many reasons that are not bigoted exist. :roll:

Hatuey said:
You're being intellectually dishonest and using the same old Stormfront white washing of what is racism.
Click to expand...

Storm Front? What do they have to do with anything? I guess you must be a regular there? Considering you think anyone who disagrees is ...

Racist, bigot etc.

Hatuey said:
If you do not feel races should mix you're not being intolerant of other races? Why are you playing semantics?
Click to expand...

Playing semantics? How is a Chinese woman for example wanting to stay within her own race as far as dating and marriage etc make her intolerant????

Hatuey said:
You're the one who must think we're stupid.
Click to expand...

After your last comment, I don't have to think about it anymore.

Hatuey said:
Yes.
Click to expand...

:roll:

Hatuey said:
You proved nothing. You white washed the definition of racism to suit your agenda.
Click to expand...

Ummm... I used the dictionary. I guess Webster is in on the conspiracy? :shock:

Hatuey said:
Not really. I could care less what you do with your life as long as A) It's consensual B) It doesn't bother me. Thanks for asking!
Click to expand...

Yes really.
 
I'd say "ignorant," but that's hard to say since it's hardly common knowledge that homosexuality is normal and natural, and that everyone has a "gay gene" which activates in response to certain chemicals in the womb.
Gay people are no different than infertile couples.
 
SovereignState said:
I'd say "ignorant," but that's hard to say since it's hardly common knowledge that homosexuality is normal and natural, and that everyone has a "gay gene" which activates in response to certain chemicals in the womb.
Gay people are no different than infertile couples.
Click to expand...

Is this sarcasm or do you actually believe that?

Welcome to the forums by the way!
 
Ikari said:
This is still deflect away from the original post. But let's see.

You don't see marriage as a personal issue, I have to accept that.
I say people who use the man/women thing is mostly religious based, but you don't have to accept that. I have to accept your premise that you put forth, regardless of right to contract. But your SCotUS cases prove the rationalization people make when they make the male/female argument. I didn't toss out an entire branch of government...I tossed out your argument that people use male/female arguments as "law based" and not religious based on account of SCotUS cases which declared marriage a civil right and then claimed interracial marriage was a civil right as well. I think many people who use the male/female argument are not doing so with these cases in mind, but rather going off their own personal perception of what marriage should be between which is influenced and dictated primarily through their religion. But whatever, you basically want to define yourself as always right and that people must always accept your base premise of your arguments and that you don't have to do the same for others. Good job Mr. "honest".
Click to expand...

Can I get a witnis?
1069 said:
Yet I've known Jerry for many months now, and while I disagree with virtually every word he types, nothing about him suggests a propensity for lying.
Click to expand...

Ikari said:
Jerry said:
I've just grown so tired of quoting Loving, Skinner and others, which conclusivly prove you wrong, that I no longer take any of your argments seriously.
Click to expand...
I grow tired of useless philosophy thrown at the execution of contract and will. I will no longer take any of your arguments seriously.
Click to expand...

No one was saying anything about religion, in any way.

I say I get tired of quoting SCOTUS, you say you get tired of hearing it.

What's there to lie about?
 
Last edited:
Hatuey said:
If you oppose blacks and whites getting married : you're a racist.

If you oppose rich people and poor people getting married : you're an elitist snob.

If you oppose Muslims marrying Christians : you're a bigot.

I wonder why we have no problem calling all these people for what they are but yet we're supposed to white wash the stance of bigots who oppose same sex marriage as 'a different opinion'? Give me a ****ing break. :roll:
Click to expand...
So you'd agree that The Obama, Hillary and Joe Biden are bigots -- yes?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom