I see where Mitt Romney and other liberal Republicans who just don't "get it" are afraid that the mass media, or even worse, the Democrats, might view them as obstructing the dominant party's socialist anti-American, anti-freedom agenda.
Well, why the hell shouldn't real American stand opposed to those policies that have proven to be wrong, expensive, failed, and harmful?
The Republicans should embrace The Party of No. They should say "NO" most vociferously to:
Any and every tax increase.
Any and every unconstitutional spending increase.
Any and every unconstitutional program.
Any and every attempt to nationalize health care.
Any and every attempt to prevent domestic oil drilling.
Any and all attempts to decriminalize the invasion of the United States by Mexico.
Any and all attempts to coddling dictators.
Any and all Liberal and anti-American judicial appointments.
Any and all unfunded mandates.
Any and all attempts to apologize to any other nation for anything in our past, since compared to them our history is spotless.
Any and all attempts to curtail or otherwise infringe on our Constitutional freedoms, including expected new efforts at media censorship from the left, the expected new assualts on gun ownership freedoms, etc.
And say "no" to practically any the Democrats do, because they're Democrats, and they wouldn't be Democrats if they weren't wrong almost all the time on almost everything under the sun.
I"m all for the new Party of No.
So, do you support the liberal Republican's efforts to avoid saying "no"< or do you think the word "no" is a wonderful word that isn't heard often enough in the halls of Congress?