View Poll Results: Which jobs does an AK-47 do better?

Voters
30. You may not vote on this poll
  • Hunting (small game)

    8 26.67%
  • Hunting (large game)

    11 36.67%
  • Carrying with you for self-defense

    6 20.00%
  • Keeping in the home for self-defense

    11 36.67%
  • A fun day at the shooting range

    20 66.67%
  • Fending off the police/feds in a shootout

    14 46.67%
  • Killing as many people as possible before you are stopped

    10 33.33%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 95

Thread: In Which Case Would You Rather Have an AK-47?

  1. #31
    Matthew 16:3
    Tucker Case's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:35 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,365

    Re: In Which Case Would You Rather Have an AK-47?

    Now that would be quite useful against those filthy undead bastards.

  2. #32
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 10:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: In Which Case Would You Rather Have an AK-47?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    Sure, if the Zombies are nice enough to come at you one at a time, a pistol is better. But they don't. They come in hordes. A fully automatic weapon is far more useful when a horde is approaching because you can slow down many of them and escape to safer territory.
    Nope. You're still a zombie. Full auto body shots slow down things that actually need their body. Zombies of course don't. And fully automatic weapons are downright terrible for head shots. The actual better choice is not a firearm at all since you run out of ammo at the worst times. A kukuri, machete, double headed axe, or a longsword is better as none require ammunition. Trick question actually.

    You would do a bang up job stopping one Zombie for good with your pistol, but I'd rather seek safer territory, perhaps a tree since Zombies can't climb trees for ****, and fire down upon the lot of 'em from above.

    Amateurs....
    Well, that is pretty much the assumed strategy. Why bother fighting them when you can get to safety? That said, if we had to use firearms, and our choices were a pistol or an AK, I'd go with the pistol. Plus it's lighter.
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  3. #33
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 10:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: In Which Case Would You Rather Have an AK-47?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    Exactly. I know I'm much more likely to fend off some Zombies than get into a shootout with cops.
    Pretty much. I'm not planning the fight the police any time soon, but god knows we're due for a Zombie infestation sooner or later.
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  4. #34
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Seen
    09-22-16 @ 07:06 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,215

    Re: In Which Case Would You Rather Have an AK-47?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    Sure, if the Zombies are nice enough to come at you one at a time, a pistol is better. But they don't. They come in hordes. A fully automatic weapon is far more useful when a horde is approaching because you can slow down many of them and escape to safer territory.

    You would do a bang up job stopping one Zombie for good with your pistol, but I'd rather seek safer territory, perhaps a tree since Zombies can't climb trees for ****, and fire down upon the lot of 'em from above.

    Amateurs....
    Amateurs WTF r u talking about¿ any idiot knows flame throwers are the only way to defeat zombies

  5. #35
    Matthew 16:3
    Tucker Case's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:35 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,365

    Re: In Which Case Would You Rather Have an AK-47?

    Quote Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
    Nope. You're still a zombie. Full auto body shots slow down things that actually need their body. Zombies of course don't. And fully automatic weapons are downright terrible for head shots. The actual better choice is not a firearm at all since you run out of ammo at the worst times. A kukuri, machete, double headed axe, or a longsword is better as none require ammunition. Trick question actually.
    They do need their bodies for efficient locomotion.

    Although for optimal performance against the undead, your should use a shotgun and replace your left hand with a chainsaw.




    Well, that is pretty much the assumed strategy. Why bother fighting them when you can get to safety? That said, if we had to use firearms, and our choices were a pistol or an AK, I'd go with the pistol. Plus it's lighter.
    If forced between the two, a combo would probably be the best approach. Use the AK to hold them off for a bit, and then use the pistol to take them out for good.

    It's really a two-man operation.

  6. #36
    Matthew 16:3
    Tucker Case's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:35 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,365

    Re: In Which Case Would You Rather Have an AK-47?

    Quote Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
    Amateurs WTF r u talking about¿ any idiot knows flame throwers are the only way to defeat zombies
    The above pic shows the best way to deal with zombies.

  7. #37
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 10:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: In Which Case Would You Rather Have an AK-47?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    They do need their bodies for efficient locomotion.
    Not that important when there are thousands of them coming at you.

    Although for optimal performance against the undead, your should use a shotgun and replace your left hand with a chainsaw.
    Pretty much. Melee weapons are better choices. A suit of armor, chainmail or other bite proof, grab resistant garb with a big *** sword will do the trick.

    If forced between the two, a combo would probably be the best approach. Use the AK to hold them off for a bit, and then use the pistol to take them out for good.

    It's really a two-man operation.
    Dude. Too much Resident Evil 5 going on there.
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  8. #38
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 10:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: In Which Case Would You Rather Have an AK-47?

    Quote Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
    Amateurs WTF r u talking about¿ any idiot knows flame throwers are the only way to defeat zombies
    Then you just got a mob of flaming Zombies you can't get close to melee or accurately shoot in the head. Not the best choice. Plus zombies don't feel pain. A phalanx would work somewhat well as spears could stab the zombies in the head while the formation protects the people inside the formation. And the modern day phalanx anti-missile gun should essentially vaporize zombies with its thousands of rounds per second capacity.
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  9. #39
    Matthew 16:3
    Tucker Case's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:35 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,365

    Re: In Which Case Would You Rather Have an AK-47?

    Quote Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
    Not that important when there are thousands of them coming at you.
    Which is what I'm saying. You need to slow down the ones in front so that they trip up the one's in the back.



    Pretty much. Melee weapons are better choices. A suit of armor, chainmail or other bite proof, grab resistant garb with a big *** sword will do the trick.
    Agreed.


    Dude. Too much Resident Evil 5 going on there.
    Don't diss RE5 and other preparatory games.

    I, for one, am quite comforted that our children will be prepared for Zombie invasions and our forthcoming post-apocalyptic nightmare.

  10. #40
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Seen
    09-22-16 @ 07:06 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,215

    Re: In Which Case Would You Rather Have an AK-47?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    The above pic shows the best way to deal with zombies.
    Nice tits and all but we are fighting zombies

Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •