Had humans observed it before mid-1800s?
No one was really looking for it until the theory of evolution. Why would they?
justone said:
So you are the man I have been looking for, the only man who posses a graph which would show how long does it take for a simple asexual organism to evolve into sexually reproductive organism?
"How long" would depend entirely on circumstance, but on earth it took about 2.5 billion years. The oldest forms of "life" (which were much simpler than anything we normally consider "life" today) appeared about 3.5 billion years ago, and sex first evolved about 1 billion years ago.
justone said:
How many generations in the frame of time would it take to a primitive sea organism to develop wings and fly in the air?
Approximately 3.35 billion years. The first life appeared in the oceans about 3.5 billion years ago. Archaeopteryx evolved about 150 million years ago.
justone said:
How long does it take to a new organ to establish communication with barin and accordingly with other organs? If there have been 0 speciation in all the rich world of species around us during all existence of humanity, how does it come that 0 multiplied by a millennium makes a positive number?
Because A) It isn't zero, it could be some fraction less than one; and B) just because it hasn't been observed in the 150 years since humans have been looking for it doesn't mean that it's never happened in the existence of humanity. Even humans themselves have evolved into different species. Homo habilis looked very different than homo sapiens.
Keep in mind that there is no ironclad rule that it takes X number of years for Trait Y to evolve. It depends entirely on the environment and circumstance. It's frequently been said that if you could hit the "Reset" button on the earth to return it to its primordial state, it is a virtual certainty that nothing even remotely resembling humans would evolve again. There are just too many random occurrences that affect the planet's environment.
justone said:
Show me mathematics, and show what observations of the changes are described by the same mathematics.
Mathematics of what? I'm not sure what you're asking for.
justone said:
Your interpretation of fossils is not an example of speciation. That is not to mention that there are no fossils to cause such an interpretation. Have you been to a Museum of natural history ever? Have you looked at the fossils, - you will see a reconstruction (by imagination) of a fossil and above it – drawings of the chain of evolution as results of imagination of the artist. Imagination is not a record.
Again, I'm not sure what you're implying? Are you suggesting that the scientists may have gotten the skeleton wrong, and what they think is the creature's skull is actually its ass?
justone said:
How evolution can be observed without speciation observed?
There are countless examples. I'll just give you one of my favorites:
Up until the 1700s, there were lots of pepper moths in England. Most of them were white, but there were a few black ones as well. They were the same species, but a few minor genes affected the color of them. The moths often lived around white birch trees. Unsurprisingly, the white moths camouflaged better than the black moths, and were less likely to be eaten. This explains why they outnumbered the black moths.
When the Industrial Revolution began, England's new factories began producing large quantities of black soot, which stuck to the birch trees. Within just a few generations, the black moths suddenly outnumbered the white moths.
In the 1970s, England (like most developed countries) began implementing stricter pollution controls...and now white moths are making a comeback once again.
Evolution in action.
justone said:
Because the way you are trying to prove evolution to me – applying your logic to empirical evidence is no different from existent proofs of God.
If you want to debate God, there is a religion/philosophy board on this forum.