I believe that evolution occurs. As far as I'm concerned if someone denies evolution they're a tard. .
The key word is “believe”. So those who have different beliefs must be tards? So Nobel prize-winner Dr. Richard Smalley is a tard?
Nobel prize-winner Dr. Richard Smalley Professor of Chemistry and a Professor of Physics and Astronomy had this to say: "Evolution has just been dealt its death blow. After reading Origins of Life, with my background in chemistry and physics, it is clear evolution could not have occurred."
“The burden of proof is on those who don't believe that "'Genesis' was right, and there was a creation, and that Creator is still involved. ‘’
Richard Smalley - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please link me to one justone Nobel Prize winner in physics who would say something like : After reading Origins of Life, with my background in chemistry and physics, it is clear evolution have occurred."
Dr. Robert Gange is a research scientist (cryophisics), engineer, and adjunct professor the David Sarnoff Research Center in Princeton. He just so happened to write a pro-creation book entitled, "Origins and Destiny". Aside from the book itself, the back cover has this interesting endorsement from the late mathematician, physicist, and Nobel Laureate Eugene P. Wigner (1963, physics):
"I was particularly pleased with Dr. Gange's refusal of the idea of materialism, and the convincing arguments supporting that refusal. In fact, the book will be a welcome response to materialism. Good luck, for a good book!"
(Origins and Destiny - A Scientist Examines God's Handiwork - by Dr. Robert Gange)
Please link me to one justone Nobel Prize winner in physics who has endorsed one justone pro-evolution book.
Charles Hard Townes, winner of a Nobel Prize in Physics and a UC Berkeley professor makes the following interesting argument:
"Intelligent design, as one sees it from a scientific point of view, seems to be quite real.”
Nobel Prize winner Charles Townes on evolution and "intelligent design"
Please link me to one justone Nobel Prize winner who finds evolution real from a scientific point of view?
In a short search I have found the 3 who has expressed their personal beliefs and the base of their beliefs publicly.
How many Nobel Prize winners have expressed their personal beliefs in the same way as the 3 physicists above?
How many Nobel Prize winners in Physics have made a pro-evolution statement? How many Nobel Prize winners have made a pro-evolution statement? How many Nobel Prize winners in Physics have made a pro-evolution statement?
Nobel prize-winner Dr. Richard Smalley, Nobel Laureate Eugene P. Wigner, Charles Hard Townes, winner of a Nobel Prize in Physics are tards in your view?
How anybody in the right mind can argue to an evolutionist after that? Sure they are tards and I am a tard, I wonder what do you base your personal belief on, we do on our background in chemistry and physics, - what is your base? Explain to me where do your beliefs stem from? Step by step – what have made a fanatic of evolution?
Theory of Evolution = theory. .
Theory of evolution does not exist. These are theories:
[ame="http://www.amazon.com/Theory-Machines-Mechanisms-John-Uicker/dp/019515598X"]Amazon.com: Theory of Machines and Mechanisms: John J. Uicker, Gordon R. Pennock, the late Joseph E. Shigley: Books[/ame]
Presents the basic mathematical theory of machines.
"The theory of machines and mechanisms is an applied science that is used to understand the relationships between the geometry and motions of the parts..."
Basic Electric Circuit Theory
[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Theory-Wing-Sections-Including-Summary/dp/0486605868/ref=pd_sim_b_1]Amazon.com: Theory of Wing Sections: Including a Summary of Airfoil Data (Dover Books on Physics): Ira H. Abbott, A. E. von Doenhoff: Books[/ame]
[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Theoretical-Hydrodynamics-L-M-Milne-Thomson/dp/0486689700/ref=pd_sim_b_5]Amazon.com: Theoretical Hydrodynamics: L. M. Milne-Thomson: Books[/ame]
Schaums Outline of Theory and Problems of Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics specs
SpringerLink - Journal Article
[ame="http://www.amazon.com/Statistical-Thermodynamics-Erwin-Schrodinger/dp/0486661016"]Amazon.com: Statistical Thermodynamics: Erwin Schrodinger: Books[/ame]
Theory is an apparatus of a certain part of science, where all physical laws and results of experiments related to a certain group of observed phenomena are generalized and unified AND SIMPLYFIED by means of mathematics and geometry.
When Evolution completely lacks mathematics, when evolutionists do not even understand the simplest question related to mathematics, when Evolution was founded by an individual who couldn’t pass an entrance exam to a basic mathematics class, - evolutionists still dare to call millions of pages of total delirium a theory ????? - evolution should be banned in schools for degrading science and ruining lives.
The key word is always, - do you believe, BELIVE. Evolution, like intelligent design are systems of personal beliefs based on empirical evidence and logic, they have nothing to do to science. Science is an empirical experimental activity. The key word of science is experiment. Not evidence, but experiment.
Evolution however is an observable factual occurrence.
Observed Instances of Speciation
by Joseph Boxhorn
Copyright © 1993-2004
[Last Update: September 1, 1995]
[ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciation]Speciation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]
Speciation is the evolutionary process by which new biological species arise. There are four modes of natural speciation, based on the extent to which speciating populations are geographically isolated from one another: allopatric, peripatric, parapatric, and sympatric. Speciation may also be induced artificially, through animal husbandry or laboratory experiments. Observed examples of each kind of speciation are provided throughout.[1]
Can you link me to one justone peer reviewed publication which demonstrates one justone observable factual occurrence of
a NEW biological species arisal? One justone reference in the whole history of thousands experiments and observations? Not 2 not 3 not many, but one justone? One justone
Observed example of speciation of whatever kind?