I did. See above.I am sorry, but I didn't know Rush was a TV show, I only listen to him. Perhaps you can supply the video showing Rush "mocking" Michaels affliction; if that is the case, then I would be in agreement that he indeed "mocked" Michael.
Once again, what we have here are emotional hysterics coming from a liberally biased point of view that wishes to exaggerate the reality in order to defend the indefensible.
Anyone watching this video with a modicum of honesty cannot claim this is "mocking" a disease.
Good lord, you are quite amazing in your desperation to demagogue those you hate.
And no, I don't hate Rush Limbaugh one iota. I think he's brilliant. As I asked earlier I would really appreciate it if you could actually go back and read my posts regarding Rush Limbaugh.
How was he being mocked? Did Rush say; "look at that retard, he's faking it?"
No, he merely suggested that in order to have a greater effect, he allowed himself to be recorded with his "tic" in order to *appeal to emotions* rather than the facts of the cause he supported.
He also suggested that he had done plenty of other appearances completely normal and without evidence of having the "tic." How is this mocking him?
I am always amused at the *emotional hysterics* of Liberals who when called on their tactics become hurt and insulted.
The debate about embryonic cell research was based on a lie: That President Bush was denying funding for it, and that it was somehow this miraculous cure for conditions that Michael suffered from.
The truth was that Bush merely refused Federal Tax Payer funding for the research on moral grounds which, if it was such a miracle cure, can easily find PRIVATE funding. The other TRUTH is that to date, there has been ZERO evidence that embryonic stem cells are any better at cures than adult stem cells.
So aside from all the *emotional hyperbole* you bring, how was this in the least way mocking Michael?
Now either you are a very good liar, or you have done a pretty convincing job on your own psyche to suggest that you actually like Rush and think he is brilliant.
But suffice it to say, beyond the typically emotional hysterics behind Liberal logic, there is nothing here other than your exaggerations, hyperbole and innuendo about Rush and his positions and your biased perceptions about REALITY.
Carry on; I will leave you with the last word as once again we enter into the circle of futility where you ignore everything others post and stick to your silly illogical talking points.
Calling this a claim is about as dumb as suggesting it had substance.
Carry on; once again you add nothing to the thread topic or debate.