No, he merely suggested that in order to have a greater effect, he allowed himself to be recorded with his "tic" in order to appeal to emotions rather than the facts of the cause he supported.
He also suggested that he had done plenty of other appearances completely normal and without evidence of having the "tic." How is this mocking him?
I am always amused at the emotional hysterics of Liberals who when called on their tactics become hurt and insulted.
The debate about embryonic cell research was based on a lie: That President Bush was denying funding for it, and that it was somehow this miraculous cure for conditions that Michael suffered from.
The truth was that Bush merely refused Federal Tax Payer funding for the research on moral grounds which, if it was such a miracle cure, can easily find PRIVATE funding. The other TRUTH is that to date, there has been ZERO evidence that embryonic stem cells are any better at cures than adult stem cells.
So aside from all the emotional hyperbole you bring, how was this in the least way mocking Michael?