• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Which is more barbaric/worse?

Which is more barbaric/worse?

  • Killing an animal for someones else to eat.

    Votes: 1 50.0%

  • Eating an animal someone else has killed.

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • Total voters
    2
Cilogy

Cilogy

Pathetic Douchebag
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
1,587
Reaction score
374
Location
Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Which of these would you say is worse or closer to barbarianism?

Choose one.



EDIT: Yes, I know I misspelled "someone." What are you gonna do about it?

.
 
Last edited:
There is nothing barbaric about killing animals and eating them. I don't see the problem with either act.
 
The question may well be idiotic. But it's not a logic fallacy.

;)
 
Grateful Heart said:
The question may well be idiotic. But it's not a logic fallacy.

;)
Click to expand...

True. Vegans and vegetarians might be the first to recognize that it's an informal fallacy.
 
Cilogy said:
Which is more barbaric/worse?
  • Killing an animal for someones else to eat.
  • Eating an animal someone else has killed
.
Click to expand...

jerry-albums-jerry-s-junk-picture13-cownabalism.jpg
 
Gee, how about:

3 - Killing a food animal, but not eating it.
4 - Starving
5 - Killing plants for someone else to eat.
6 - Eating plants someon else has killed.
7 - Killing someone for someone else to eat.
8 - Eating someone someone else has killed.
9 - Tofu
 
Scarecrow Akhbar said:
Gee, how about:

3 - Killing a food animal, but not eating it.
4 - Starving
5 - Killing plants for someone else to eat.
6 - Eating plants someon else has killed.
7 - Killing someone for someone else to eat.
8 - Eating someone someone else has killed.
9 - Tofu
Click to expand...

Tofu, no contest.
 
Was there some point to this poll??


I'm guessing, "no"?
 
Cilogy said:
Which of these would you say is worse or closer to barbarianism?

Choose one.



EDIT: Yes, I know I misspelled "someone." What are you gonna do about it?

.
Click to expand...
Oh great another ***** vegan poll. It cracks me up how vegans try to defy nature by refusing to eat meat.Humans are omnivores by nature and it is ****en idiotic to give up meat or to give up vegatables.
 
Neither is barbaric, and neither is worse than the other. In Econ 101, we call this supply and demand.
 
Keep in mind part of the reason we are doing so well as a species is we have a varied diet.

If we want animals we have to kill them anyway nobody wants wolves running round their towns and as a result we have to take their place by killing their prey.
 
Last edited:
Does roadkill count?

:confused:
 
Let's add another dimension to it... how about these two extra choices....

An animal killing an Animal for an animal to eat.

or

An Animal killing an animal for an Animal to eat.
 
Arch Enemy said:
Let's add another dimension to it... how about these two extra choices....

An animal killing an Animal for an animal to eat.

or

An Animal killing an animal for an Animal to eat.
Click to expand...

I'm going with your second option. two Animals, with capital A's? That's just downright oppressive to the lowercase animals.
 
WI Crippler said:
I'm going with your second option. two Animals, with capital A's? That's just downright oppressive to the lowercase animals.
Click to expand...

I forgot what exact work it is a reference to, but in some story Animals (with a capital A) can speak....
 
Cilogy said:
Which of these would you say is worse or closer to barbarianism?

Choose one.



EDIT: Yes, I know I misspelled "someone." What are you gonna do about it?

.
Click to expand...
I'll beat you over your head with some bloody , but delicious red meat.
Be respectful of others, learn to spell.
The poll ?
Ha!:rofl
Did you ever hear of "spell check"..??
 
Jerry said:
Tofu, no contest.
Click to expand...

I'd gladly commit bovine genocide if it meant I would never have to eat tofu. Send the cows to Auschwitz.
 
Last edited:
WI Crippler said:
Neither is barbaric, and neither is worse than the other. In Econ 101, we call this supply and demand.
Click to expand...

What he said.

Neither is barbaric. Unless you consider the lion killing the gazelle to be "barbaric".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom