View Poll Results: Which is more barbaric/worse?

Voters
3. You may not vote on this poll
  • Killing an animal for someones else to eat.

    2 66.67%
  • Eating an animal someone else has killed.

    1 33.33%
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 62

Thread: Which is more barbaric/worse?

  1. #11
    Sage
    First Thought's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    DFW, Texas
    Last Seen
    12-01-10 @ 02:34 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    6,218

    Re: Which is more barbaric/worse?

    "An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi

  2. #12
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    09-27-16 @ 07:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    15,422
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Which is more barbaric/worse?

    Neither is barbaric, and neither is worse than the other. In Econ 101, we call this supply and demand.
    "Loyalty only matters when there's a hundred reasons not to be-" Gen. Mattis

  3. #13
    blond bombshell

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    uk
    Last Seen
    10-19-12 @ 09:03 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    4,729

    Re: Which is more barbaric/worse?

    Keep in mind part of the reason we are doing so well as a species is we have a varied diet.

    If we want animals we have to kill them anyway nobody wants wolves running round their towns and as a result we have to take their place by killing their prey.
    Last edited by mikhail; 04-02-09 at 06:58 PM.
    The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority. The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority. The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking.

  4. #14
    Educator Grateful Heart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Last Seen
    12-27-09 @ 02:58 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,010

    Re: Which is more barbaric/worse?

    Does roadkill count?


  5. #15
    Count Smackula
    rathi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    California
    Last Seen
    10-31-15 @ 08:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    7,890

    Re: Which is more barbaric/worse?

    Does roadkill count?
    Only if you eat it.

  6. #16
    Familiaist


    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Last Seen
    09-26-12 @ 12:37 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    7,470

    Re: Which is more barbaric/worse?

    Let's add another dimension to it... how about these two extra choices....

    An animal killing an Animal for an animal to eat.

    or

    An Animal killing an animal for an Animal to eat.
    "I do not underestimate the ability of fanatical groups of terrorists to kill and destroy, but they do not threaten the life of the nation. Whether we would survive Hitler hung in the balance, but there is no doubt that we shall survive al-Qa'ida." -- Lord Hoffmann

  7. #17
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    09-27-16 @ 07:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    15,422
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Which is more barbaric/worse?

    Quote Originally Posted by Arch Enemy View Post
    Let's add another dimension to it... how about these two extra choices....

    An animal killing an Animal for an animal to eat.

    or

    An Animal killing an animal for an Animal to eat.
    I'm going with your second option. two Animals, with capital A's? That's just downright oppressive to the lowercase animals.
    "Loyalty only matters when there's a hundred reasons not to be-" Gen. Mattis

  8. #18
    Familiaist


    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Last Seen
    09-26-12 @ 12:37 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    7,470

    Re: Which is more barbaric/worse?

    Quote Originally Posted by WI Crippler View Post
    I'm going with your second option. two Animals, with capital A's? That's just downright oppressive to the lowercase animals.
    I forgot what exact work it is a reference to, but in some story Animals (with a capital A) can speak....
    "I do not underestimate the ability of fanatical groups of terrorists to kill and destroy, but they do not threaten the life of the nation. Whether we would survive Hitler hung in the balance, but there is no doubt that we shall survive al-Qa'ida." -- Lord Hoffmann

  9. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Last Seen
    01-21-16 @ 11:21 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    51,124

    Re: Which is more barbaric/worse?

    Quote Originally Posted by WI Crippler View Post
    I'm going with your second option. two Animals, with capital A's? That's just downright oppressive to the lowercase animals.

  10. #20
    Sage

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Goldsboro,PA
    Last Seen
    09-26-16 @ 09:59 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    5,420
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Which is more barbaric/worse?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cilogy View Post
    Which of these would you say is worse or closer to barbarianism?

    Choose one.



    EDIT: Yes, I know I misspelled "someone." What are you gonna do about it?

    .
    I'll beat you over your head with some bloody , but delicious red meat.
    Be respectful of others, learn to spell.
    The poll ?
    Ha!
    Did you ever hear of "spell check"..??

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •