Global Warming Petition Project
Over 31000 scientists don't agree with the consensus. Isn't a consensus something that is reached in lieu of a fact? I mean if it can be proven beyond all doubt then a consensus isn't necessary. In truth there isn't room in science for a consensus, because science doesn't accept opinions, it requires empirical, reproducible, peer reviewed evidence and nothing less. Unless of course there are government grants at stake.
Gravity is anything but a consensus, it is a law in the strictest sense. If you place an object in the air without any type of support the object has absolutely no choice but to obey the law, and fall to the earth.
The fact that our climate is and has been changing all through history is indisputable. The idea that we are causing it, or that we have the power to control it, well in my opinion is grandiose.
We can be good stewards of the environment without crushing our economy and punishing the poorest among us by making the very basics of life unaffordable. Poor people can't always afford the high ideals some will place on them.