We can not marry whomever we want.Originally Posted by Gibberish
How hard is that to understand?
The term civil union should replace the term marriage for legal purposes
Both terms, civil union (for gay couples)and marriage (for straight), should be used
The term marriage should be use equally for gay and straight couples
Gay couples should not be able to have the rights of marriage at all.
We can not marry whomever we want.
How hard is that to understand?
Any two consenting heterosexual people of age can get married. What I wonder is that since a man can marry a woman why can not a woman marry a womaan? It seems like gender discrimination to me.
which gender is being discriminated against?
Both. If a man can marry a woman why can not a woman......and if a woman can marry a man why can not a man marry a man? It is because of gender.
but they're being treated equally.
No they aren't. A man can do woman can not do and vice versa. If they were being treated equally both being equally a woman could do what a man does and vice versa.
Wrong.
Brother's can't marry sisters, or first cusins, or parents...etc, etc, ad nausium.
A hetero can not marry another hetero of the same gender.
Your premis is conclusivly false.
Your position is born out of grose ignorence.
The state has not interest in gay couples because those couples, typicly, will not be producing healthy little tax payers.
It's that simple.
Heteros do not have any such 'right to marry whomever they choose'.
I have an answer for everything...you may not like the answer or it may not satisfy your curiosity..but it will still be an answer. ~ Kal'Stang
My mind and my heart are saying I'm in my twenties. My body is pointing at my mind and heart and laughing its ass off. ~ Kal'Stang
Yes, they are.
Each is under the same restriction that the other is.
That's equality.
He can marry someone of the opposite gender just as she can.
That's equality.
They can each do what the other can do.
That's equality.
That was too easy
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote