View Poll Results: Should civil unions replace marriage for legal purposes?

Voters
66. You may not vote on this poll
  • The term civil union should replace the term marriage for legal purposes

    15 22.73%
  • Both terms, civil union (for gay couples)and marriage (for straight), should be used

    25 37.88%
  • The term marriage should be use equally for gay and straight couples

    21 31.82%
  • Gay couples should not be able to have the rights of marriage at all.

    5 7.58%
Page 31 of 35 FirstFirst ... 212930313233 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 310 of 345

Thread: Civil Unions

  1. #301
    User Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Western North Carolina
    Last Seen
    02-23-14 @ 09:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    131

    Re: Civil Unions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    WTF? Is this Pookie / BH thing a joke? Seriously... two accounts?
    Yes, it is. We are allowed to be here together. I'll PM you and explain it.
    Purrs,
    Pookie
    No matter how much the cats fight, there always seems to be plenty of kittens.
    ~ Abraham Lincoln

  2. #302
    Sage
    Bodhisattva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:17 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    48,641

    Re: Civil Unions

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    Okay, so you're going to call a dinner between a bunch of friends "communion?"
    I do not see an issue here as long as the rights are the same.
    And BH is not you. It's BetterHalf, mmmkay?
    Purrs,
    Pookie
    Look, if you are going to make an analogy, it has to relate to the existing situation in some manner.
    In that dinner thingy, nobody is being denied anything.
    Result? Analogy Failed.

    After I put the "rights" issue as bluntly as I did... you still think that the "rights" are the same?
    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    The Supreme Court can't interpret The Constitution. They don't have that power.

  3. #303
    User Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Western North Carolina
    Last Seen
    02-23-14 @ 09:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    131

    Re: Civil Unions

    What I was saying is that no matter what it's called, if the rights are exactly the same, then it's not discrimination.
    Check your PM box.
    Purrs,
    Pookie
    No matter how much the cats fight, there always seems to be plenty of kittens.
    ~ Abraham Lincoln

  4. #304
    Sage
    Bodhisattva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:17 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    48,641

    Re: Civil Unions

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    What I was saying is that no matter what it's called, if the rights are exactly the same, then it's not discrimination.
    Check your PM box.
    Purrs,
    Pookie
    But the rights aren't the same if they cant be called the same thing... hence, it is Discrimination.
    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    The Supreme Court can't interpret The Constitution. They don't have that power.

  5. #305
    Old Soul

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    ND
    Last Seen
    10-18-13 @ 09:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,915

    Re: Civil Unions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    But the rights aren't the same if they cant be called the same thing... hence, it is Discrimination.
    I appreciate that you're still capitalizing Discrimination.

  6. #306
    User Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Western North Carolina
    Last Seen
    02-23-14 @ 09:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    131

    Re: Civil Unions

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    But the rights aren't the same if they cant be called the same thing... hence, it is Discrimination.
    How are rights not the same when they are the same?
    Purrs,
    Pookie
    No matter how much the cats fight, there always seems to be plenty of kittens.
    ~ Abraham Lincoln

  7. #307
    Old Soul

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    ND
    Last Seen
    10-18-13 @ 09:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,915

    Re: Civil Unions

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    How are rights not the same when they are the same?
    Purrs,
    Pookie
    when is a door not a door?

  8. #308
    Sage
    Bodhisattva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:17 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    48,641

    Re: Civil Unions

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    How are rights not the same when they are the same?
    Purrs,
    Pookie
    How are the rights the same when they are not the same?

    If the term "marriage" is not considered a right, to you...
    Then why can't homosexuals get "Married"?
    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    The Supreme Court can't interpret The Constitution. They don't have that power.

  9. #309
    Sage
    Bodhisattva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:17 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    48,641

    Re: Civil Unions

    Quote Originally Posted by emdash View Post
    bff
    ????



    if he "discriminates" against people of all races including his own then it's meaningless to call him racist or to imply that his hatred is based on race at all.

    if smoking becomes illegal for men and also for women, the government is not discriminating based on gender, though both genders are affected.

    if two genders are being discriminated against instead of one, it does not necessarily negate all discrimination but it negates the idea of gender discrimination.
    I understand what you are saying, but since same sex marriage deals with same gender issues, it is gender discrimination. That is the difference...

    Perhaps I should use a different term then, like... Sexual Orientation Discrimination.


    abuse is not Discrimination unless it is based on a characteristic shared by those being mistreated, such as gender, age or skin color. for example, it can be argued that females are discriminated against in the workplace and males are discriminated against in custody battles, because in both cases one gender is given deferential treatment. if in the case of gay marriage neither males nor females are receiving worse treatment than the other as a gender group, gender is not the common characteristic you are looking for.

    it is more likely to be orientation: that is, a person's preference for either his own gender or the opposite. I think before we were having issues with the definition of orientation. you were using it to mean "the gender a person is attracted to" and I was using it to mean "a person's preference for his own gender or the opposite," so that practically our definitions would translate, respectively, to "his orientation is for males" or "his orientation is homosexual."
    Just got to this part and it looks like we agree...
    I don't know why I switched to gender when I have always argued orientation.




    in this way I could very well say that everyone affected by gay marriage laws has the same orientation (homosexual), but you would disagree, saying that half of them are attracted to men (gay) and half to women (lesbians).

    with my definition, you could argue that orientation discrimination is taking place, in that the government is abusing homosexuals (and only homosexuals), while heterosexuals are shown deferential treatment.

    I would then rebut, any adult may enter into a marriage contract if he meets the terms, and his orientation is never asked for or even taken into consideration. that would leave us right back where we started, arguing about the government's role and purpose in marriage, but blissfully free of all rhetoric like "discrimination," "bigotry," etc., which are distracting and unhelpful.
    Yeah... sorry I did miss this, what with all the pookie/BH stuff going on. Now, dealing with orientation, it adds perfectly to the bigotry, IMO. Not for any that disagree with me, but certainly for those that argue against homsexuals for the fact that they are homosexuals. I am not including you, my dear, for you are debating a "devils advocate" on terminology...

    As for your rebut, I would counter with... marriage contracts and the specifications required to get one must change so that orientation does not matter, and it must state so, for as it is now... it is a clever way to hide State Sponsored Discrimination
    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    The Supreme Court can't interpret The Constitution. They don't have that power.

  10. #310
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Last Seen
    01-21-16 @ 11:21 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    51,124

    Re: Civil Unions

    Quote Originally Posted by emdash View Post
    when is a door not a door?
    When it's propped open or taken off the hinge.

    It's then a "pass way", according to code.
    Last edited by Jerry; 03-18-09 at 11:32 PM.

Page 31 of 35 FirstFirst ... 212930313233 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •