Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und
I would like the pro-abortionists to address scientifically how it is not human life that is being killed in the process of Abortion.
If it is a human life, or human being... then it is murder:
murder /ˈmɜrdər/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [mur-der] Show IPA
–noun 1. Law. the killing of another human being under conditions specifically covered in law. In the U.S., special statutory definitions include murder committed with malice aforethought, characterized by deliberation or premeditation or occurring during the commission of another serious crime, as robbery or arson (first-degree murder), and murder by intent but without deliberation or premeditation (second-degree murder).
It certainly does, that is, unless you can prove scientifically that a baby inside the womb one day before it is born is not a human being, but the next day after its birth it is suddenly a human being. That is why it needs to be scientific. What is the differentiation from one day to the next that disallows the baby from being considered a human being? How about a premature baby? Is it a human being after being born after 7 months but my baby in the womb is not a human being, and thus able to be aborted at 8.5 months? That isn't even logical... unless you can back it up SCIENTIFICALLY.Sorry but abortion does not meet the legal standard for 'murder'. It does however meets the religious one. Which is the only one you're pushing for but irrelevant at the end of the day.