• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are the people in these videos stereotypical liberals?

Are the people in these videos stereotypical liberals?

  • Yes, they are just stereotypical liberals.

    Votes: 2 11.8%

  • Yes they are stereotypical liberals and they are douche bags.

    Votes: 2 11.8%

  • No,they are just douche bags.

    Votes: 13 76.5%

  • No, there is nothing wrong with them.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    17
Unions and the democrats welcome illegal migrants with open arms as they do more to depress American worker's wages than anything else.

And conservatives don't think anything should be done to protect the wages of the Americans whose jobs are stolen.
 
niftydrifty said:
I eat granola and listen to Amy Goodman religiously. but I don't have long hair. am I a 2/3rds stereotypical Liberal?

please say that I am!
Click to expand...

I watch Amy Goodman on TV, not because I am a Conservative, but because my wife is a Liberal, and I don't want a divorce. The TV is hers for that hour. :mrgreen:

But seriously, I did see a couple good episodes. One of them was a debate between Dershowitz and Chomsky. It was quite good. Sparks flew.
 
Last edited:
From what I've read, Republicans are much more likely to engage in kinky sex than "liberals", and the more conservative they are, the higher the probability they are closet homosexuals. (Get back in the closet, Senator Graham)
graham_bottom.jpg
 
Well they are just ****ing assholes but in al honesty i think there is a tiny streek of that in alot of liberal people.People dont usually recognize these things in themselves.
 
mikhail said:
Well they are just ****ing assholes but in al honesty i think there is a tiny streek of that in alot of liberal people.People dont usually recognize these things in themselves.
Click to expand...

tell me why so many hard core conservatives turn out to be gay?
 
Douchebags.

I don't see the point in sending your kid to a bilingual school, except if you're local school teaches in a language other than English. Assuming the bilingual school that idiot is sending his kid to is English/Spanish or English/French, I don't think it's neccessary to learn Spanish or French, neither will usurp English (as the lingua franca) in the future, and while I'm on the subject, Chinese Mandarin won't, either.

If they keep raising their kids like the way they were in the video, and not letting the kids have any freedom, they (the kids) will rebel when they're teenagers, I'm 100% sure, it always happens, if not the their teenage years, it'll be in their 20s at the lastest.

I've seen many kids who had an upbringing strictly around academia, learning instruments, foreign languages and playing 'fancy' sports. They all started smoking weed, and doing drugs in their early 20s.
 
jallman said:
Ayers, eco terrorists...

We could start there.
Click to expand...

You would start and end there, as you know. William Ayers, for all the hype, was not a terrorist. His "bombs" were political statements, designed for headlines, not damage. Is that all you got?
 
WillRockwell said:
You would start and end there, as you know. William Ayers, for all the hype, was not a terrorist. His "bombs" were political statements, designed for headlines, not damage. Is that all you got?
Click to expand...

There's also ELF, ALF, and the Sea Shepherd.
 
WillRockwell said:
You would start and end there, as you know. William Ayers, for all the hype, was not a terrorist. His "bombs" were political statements, designed for headlines, not damage. Is that all you got?
Click to expand...

For most of the 20th century left wing groups were the main source of terrorism until the 90s.
 
WillRockwell said:
You would start and end there, as you know. William Ayers, for all the hype, was not a terrorist. His "bombs" were political statements, designed for headlines, not damage. Is that all you got?
Click to expand...

You are flat wrong.
 
comparing the Weather Men or ELF to real left-wing terrorist groups like Red Army Faction in Germany, the Red Brigades in Italy or the ETA in Spain (although I'm not convinced they're legitimately leftist) shows how insignificant they are.

The Red Brigades assassinated the leader of the Christian Democrats in Italy in the 70s, the equivalent of Code Pink assassinating Steele today. The Weather Men were ineffective amateurs and politically irrelevant.

The KKK, however, is a legitimate terrorist organization and decidedly rightwing.
 
new coup for you said:
comparing the Weather Men or ELF to real left-wing terrorist groups like Red Army Faction in Germany, the Red Brigades in Italy or the ETA in Spain (although I'm not convinced they're legitimately leftist) shows how insignificant they are.

The Red Brigades assassinated the leader of the Christian Democrats in Italy in the 70s, the equivalent of Code Pink assassinating Steele today. The Weather Men were ineffective amateurs and politically irrelevant.

The KKK, however, is a legitimate terrorist organization and decidedly rightwing.
Click to expand...

Agreed. American left wing "terrorist" groups are generally pretty *****. The worst they've ever really done is burn houses down and steal animals from labs. Europe is where the hardcore leftist terrorists reside (or did, don't hear much about them anymore).
 
well, the ETA is still active, somewhat.

The ETA, while a terrible terrorist group (etc.) is reasonably well behaved compared to most Islamic terrorist groups. The ETA does kill people but they usually keep their collateral damage to a minimum and only target agents of the state (police officers, judges, elected officials, etc.).
 
WillRockwell said:
You would start and end there, as you know. William Ayers, for all the hype, was not a terrorist. His "bombs" were political statements, designed for headlines, not damage. Is that all you got?
Click to expand...

During the Obama campaign, I was one of the ones around here that railed against the rightwing hyperpartisan hacks that presented the Ayers issue. It had nothing to do with Obama or his campaign; and it still doesn't. Even with that, even I know that Ayers was a terrorist, and what the intent of what his bombs were to cause is irrelevant in respect to the damage they did cause. Your statement comes from one of denial and makes liberals look bad in the face of all the legitimate reactions we did against the entire Ayers idiocy. Please stop doing this.
 
jamesrage said:
Are the people in these videos stereotypical liberals?

It is a couple of clips from wifeswap or trading spouses that someone posted on youtube. PLease note that the poll is public.


Video1


Video2
Click to expand...

Yep.. I voted "none of the above".. The fat woman is just dumb, the rude British guy is right about that and a lot of things, but he is still a rude asshole, the children are well raised children. Fun is for stupid folks. The video however is ridiculous.

The stuff about not being a proud American, who the **** cares, is that not allowed? not to play the national anthem when you wake up and not wave the flag around.. Just wow :shock:
The guy is obviously the smartest in the video, but lacks manners and treat other people badly. The fat woman is just a sorry excuse for a person, she is dumb, she is fat, unsuccessful, everything, horrible. Well organized family, I respect the way he raised his children, personally I would be more strict possibly.. My children will learn skills and knowledge, not fun when they grow up. But then again, what is fun if not a reward for good work, so there will be some of that too. Dicipline is a good thing.

Anyways, yuk.. Enough of this, dont know why I even posted in this thread. Stupid poll answers. Those people have nothing to do with being "liberals".
 
Last edited:
CaptainCourtesy said:
During the Obama campaign, I was one of the ones around here that railed against the rightwing hyperpartisan hacks that presented the Ayers issue. It had nothing to do with Obama or his campaign; and it still doesn't. Even with that, even I know that Ayers was a terrorist, and what the intent of what his bombs were to cause is irrelevant in respect to the damage they did cause. Your statement comes from one of denial and makes liberals look bad in the face of all the legitimate reactions we did against the entire Ayers idiocy. Please stop doing this.
Click to expand...

William Ayers planted a two pound bomb at the Pentagon. No one was killed or injured. This is not denial, it is fact. His intent was to make a political statement at the height of the Vietnam War, not to terrorize. To compare Ayers with AlQaeda or actual terrorist organizations is ridiculous.
 
WillRockwell said:
William Ayers planted a two pound bomb at the Pentagon. No one was killed or injured. This is not denial, it is fact. His intent was to make a political statement at the height of the Vietnam War, not to terrorize. To compare Ayers with AlQaeda or actual terrorist organizations is ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Intent is irrelevant. Ayers was a terrorist. Al Qaeda can make claims about their intent. So can Hamas. If it walks like a duck...

The Ayers-Obama connection to attack Obama was ridiculous and still is. But claiming that Ayers was not a terrorist? Just as ridiculous.
 
WillRockwell said:
William Ayers planted a two pound bomb at the Pentagon. No one was killed or injured. This is not denial, it is fact. His intent was to make a political statement at the height of the Vietnam War, not to terrorize. To compare Ayers with AlQaeda or actual terrorist organizations is ridiculous.
Click to expand...

If what is supposedly the center of our nations strategical defense can be infiltrated or attacked by any group then this makes the populace feel that they, who don't have the protections of the Pentagon, are just as if not, more exposed to terrorism. Do I really have to explain to you that while many would not argue that Ayers is still a terrorist, his activities in the 70s did most certainly constitute as terrorism? Terrorism is the same regardless of who it is committed by.
 
WillRockwell said:
To compare Ayers with AlQaeda or actual terrorist organizations is ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Except that he is a terrorist. Blowing up government buildings to make political statements is pretty much the prime example of terrorism. Moreso if it is a childish tantrum thrown because he lives in a democracy where the majority of voters didn't give him his way.
 
Bill Ayers is undoubtedly a terrorist, however the abuses committed by Hoover's FBI and their COINTELPRO were so flagrant that, while not vindicating or justifying Ayer's actions, it certainly puts them into an understandable light.

Bill Ayer's wasn't playing "fair" politics, but neither was the United States government.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom